Colleges Must Stand Firm Against Far-Left Pro-Hamas Extremism

By Chris Pack and Bob Salera



Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of Hamas’s brutal terrorist attacks on Israel. And predictably, the far-left, pro-Hamas activists that caused chaos on American college campuses earlier this year were back out in force, disgustingly celebrating terrorism, and chanting antisemitic slogans. As we saw during the spring semester, this vocal minority is pushing institutions toward policies that align with extremist ideologies. In the interest of their reputations, colleges and universities must learn from their mistakes, resist this pressure, and stand firm on principles that reflect the broader values of our society.


Colleges must not allow a small but loud group to dictate policies that could lead to national ridicule and a loss of public trust. Instead, they should focus on the values held by the majority, who support Israel and reject the violence of Hamas. The backlash against Ivy League universities should serve as a cautionary tale: aligning with extremist views does not lead to respect or progress but rather to a tarnished reputation and diminished support.

 

Recent polling underscores the widespread American support for Israel and the widespread condemnation of Hamas. According to a recent Gallup poll, a significant majority of Americans view Hamas unfavorably and support Israel’s right to defend itself. Another survey revealed that the reputations of Ivy League schools have suffered due to their handling of pro-Hamas protests, indicating that appeasement of radical elements is damaging these institutions’ standing in the eyes of the public.


Compounding this issue is the current administration's weakness in handling similar pressures. President Biden’s inconsistent stance on Israel, influenced by anonymous letters from within his staff, has undermined his pro-Israel position. This internal dissent has emboldened extremist views and led to a perception of capitulation. Such weakness at the highest levels of government sends a dangerous signal that yielding to the loudest voices, rather than standing firm on principles, is an acceptable approach.



Reflecting on the 2020 election cycle offers valuable insights from our time leading the communications efforts of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC). 

 

Fresh off their victory in the 2018 election, retaking the majority in the US House of Representatives, the Democratic Conference was infused with a freshman class that included several high-profile far-left figures, including self-avowed socialists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar. These new members, part of the self-styled “Squad” endorsed extreme positions that were anathema to the vast majority of voters like Defund the Police, the Green New Deal and Abolish ICE. Instead of distancing themselves from The Squad’s extreme positions and rhetoric, their fellow House Democrats remained silent or even defended them, similar to what we are seeing on campuses with anti-Semitic protests. 

 

In response to this extremism on the other side of the aisle, under the mandate of then-House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, we adopted an aggressive tone in defining our Democratic opponents. And at the urging of well-known pollster Neil Newhouse, we made the 2020 election a referendum on the Democrats’ lurch towards socialist policies.   

 

As expected, we were laughed at. 

 

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) Chairwoman Cheri Bustos, who was responsible for protecting the centrist House Democrats, dismissed our strategy in September 2019 on a panel discussion at the Texas Tribune Festival, saying “This [socialism] label that you keep repeating over and over and over again, I think we’re going to be sick and tired of it by the time November of 2020 rolls around. It is not true. It is fake. It’s not going to stick.”

 

Then-Meet the Press’ then-host Chuck Todd was quick to pick up on Bustos’ tone, further mocking us on his panel observing, “Socialism is a central tenet of the Republican playbook this cycle. You see it with the NRCC. In the House races they try it. I mean my goodness. Who’s not a socialist as far as the NRCC is concerned?” 

 

And right on cue, while we were busy staying on message of socialism, the professional race handicappers, who we referred to internally as the “paywall prognosticators” predicted that Democrats would win “10-15 seats, with anything from 5-20 seats well within the range of possibility.” 

 

But that is not what happened. instead, the GOP made history by flipping an unprecedented 15 seats, while simultaneously losing GOP control of the Senate and White House. The fallout was immediately validating, as majority making centrist Democrats ceded that the NRCC stuck to its message and tuned out the noise of beltway press and paywall prognosticators. 

 

As reported by The Washington Post, “In the aftermath of their unexpected losses, Democrats argued that the party needs to come to terms with a bigger problem: Republicans have successfully cast the most vulnerable Democrats as “socialists” and tied them to liberal ideas, including Medicare-for-all, the Green New Deal and cutting police budgets.” One Democratic representative remarked to her colleagues, “Don’t say socialism ever again,” and “if we run this race again we will get f-----g torn apart again [at the polls]."

 

The lesson is clear: when institutions coddle extremists instead of standing up to them, it broadcasts to the world at large that the institutions in question are taking the extremists’ side. For the sake of their own reputations, as well as decency, colleges and universities must vocally reject the violent extremists on their campuses, prioritizing the values and beliefs of the broader American public over the disruptive demands of a radical few. By doing so, they will not only uphold their own integrity but also contribute to a more balanced and principled national discourse.

 

The defeated House Democrats should serve as a cautionary tale to these colleges and universities. Weakness and inconsistency in the face of extremist pressure leads to chaos and undermines core values. Colleges must choose the path of strength and principle, ensuring their policies reflect the true values of our nation and not the disruptive whims of a minority.

 

###

 

Chris Pack and Bob Salera led the NRCC’s messaging efforts during the 2020 election cycle. They now lead the communications vertical at Washington, DC public affairs firm, AxAdvocacy. 

 


By Bob Salera September 4, 2025
In our latest memo, Principal of Public Affairs Elizabeth Coit explains how organizations can stay ahead of the curve with their public affairs campaigns in the modern political and media environment: ▪️Anticipate ▪️Adapt ▪️Build Momentum
By Gabriella Bucci August 21, 2025
The Hidden Cost of Delay: Why Federal Lease Renewals Need a Proactive Strategy For federal agencies, lease renewals can feel like a distraction from mission-critical work—until delays cause real consequences: higher costs, relocation headaches, operational disruptions, and even political fallout. In our latest memo, AxAdvocacy Senior Advisor Giancarlo Brizzi—former Regional Commissioner for the U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Service—explains why early, proactive planning is essential for federal lease renewals. 📌 The risks of waiting: Lost negotiating power Unfavorable lease terms Costly temporary space Delayed facility upgrades Mission disruption 📌 Why start early: Federal approvals can take years Early alignment ensures better rates and terms Data-driven planning improves renewal success 36-month timelines dramatically reduce holdovers During his tenure at GSA, Giancarlo’s region boosted its lease replacement rate from the mid-40% range to over 90% by dollar value—all by starting early, staying disciplined, and using data to guide decisions. Federal real estate planning shouldn’t be seen as just compliance—it’s a strategic opportunity to align space with mission delivery. For agencies, the message is clear: start at least three years in advance. Your mission—and the American people—depend on it. Read the full memo HERE
By Gabriella Bucci August 6, 2025
U.S. Chamber Senior Political Strategist Ashlee Rich Stephenson was quoted in Politico Morning Trade on the Chamber’s recent tax polling, which showed wide support for the pro-growth provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. "'There is far more to the narrative than topline reports indicating the bill is unpopular, particularly when large percentages of the nation are not educated on the legislation itself or the personal benefits that will help communities across the nation,' wrote Ashlee Rich Stephenson, the Chamber’s senior political strategist." The New York Times also reported on the poll after Fox Business broke the news on Monday. The poll was shared by the White House Rapid Response , White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt , and the Small Business Administration . You can read the memo here .
By Gabriella Bucci August 6, 2025
AXADVOCACY LAUNCHES ‘STATE & LOCAL’, BRINGING NATIONAL FIREPOWER TO STATE-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS, PUBLIC AFFAIRS, AND GRASSROOTS Firm’s new offering delivers strategic communications, grassroots mobilization, and stakeholder engagement in all 50 states
By Gabriella Bucci August 1, 2025
Running digital ads has never been easier - or more misused. We see it all the time: 🚫 Vague targeting 🚫 Generic creative 🚫 Metrics that measure noise, not persuasion In our latest memo, AxAdvocacy Vice President Jonathan Dickerson breaks down how undisciplined digital strategy leads to wasted spend and what smart campaigns do differently. Read the full memo here .
By Gabriella Bucci July 29, 2025
AxAdvocacy President Ashlee Rich Stephenson joined NewsNation recently to discuss the latest headlines, including President Trump's trip to Scotland and Kamala Harris attempting to court young voters. Watch the full interview here .
By Bob Salera July 25, 2025
Earlier this week, Ashlee Rich Stephenson joined SiriusXM POTUS The Briefing to discuss President Trump’s recent economic wins: “Finally, having some permanency in the tax code is going to bring a lot of stability to an economy that is, to say ‘shaky’ is an understatement, following four years of the Biden administration.”
By Gabriella Bucci July 18, 2025
Now that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is signed into law, Congress is shifting gears toward the major year-end agenda items—and the road ahead looks bumpy. In our latest memo, AxAdvocacy Senior VP Jack Ruddy breaks down the key legislative battles to watch: Appropriations & Government Funding Defense Authorization (NDAA) Permitting Reform & Infrastructure With limited time and high stakes, organizations with policy interests in federal funding, defense, infrastructure, or permitting reform should act now. Let us know how AxAdvocacy can help you prepare. Read the full memo HERE
By Gabriella Bucci July 16, 2025
For the first time in modern history, the majority in the 435-member House is smaller than that of the 100-seat Senate. The razor-thin House margin includes only three GOP incumbents representing districts won by Kamala Harris—one of whom has already announced their retirement. With that context in mind, AxAdvocacy Principal of Communications Chris Pack recently spoke to the Washington Examiner’s Samantha-Jo Roth about the dangers of targeting majority-making Republicans in swing seats for not voting with the party 100 percent of the time. From the story: Chris Pack, a longtime GOP strategist and former NRCC official, said Trump-aligned influencers are short-sighted when they target lawmakers in swing districts. “When you have a Republican in a seat won by a Democrat like Kamala Harris, realizing that elected officials need to be more bipartisan in their vote should be common sense,” he explained. “But it’s not, because it’s all about getting clicks and likes and retweets for these influencers.” Chris also explained that many operatives view the primary election as the endgame—when in fact, it’s only halfway through: As the GOP charts its path forward, Pack urges the party to focus on winning general elections rather than settling scores in primaries. “Stop thinking the game ends at halftime. The game ends on Election Day in November,” he said. “You can either get a participation trophy or a vote to hold the gavel.” Read the full story HERE .
By Gabriella Bucci July 15, 2025
With the Supreme Court’s historic October 2024 term coming to a close, the AxAdvocacy team is pleased to share an updated version of our presentation deck detailing key cases and their potential impact on the business community.  From forum shopping to employment discrimination to parental rights, this term’s decisions will have wide-reaching effects across society. Our guide is designed to help businesses and organizations stay up to date on these issues, and enable you to plan for future legal developments that are likely to result from this set of opinions. The deck can be found here .