AxIndex, Edition 4

 

SNAPSHOT

 

Our Top 3:


1) Supreme Court Tariff Ruling Reignites Trade and Cost Debates: The Supreme Court’s decision limiting presidential tariff authority reasserts congressional control over trade policy and introduces new uncertainty around future tariffs and supply chains. By elevating trade actions into a separation-of-powers and consumer cost debate, the ruling is likely to pull tariffs back into campaign messaging, reinforcing affordability narratives and sharpening contrasts over economic leadership.


2) Big Tech Policy Money Is Rewriting Campaign Agendas: Outside groups are pouring millions into advertising and political activity tied to artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency policy, elevating emerging tech regulation from a niche debate to a mainstream campaign issue. Competing narratives frame oversight as consumer protection versus a threat to innovation, and the influx of industry spending is pressuring candidates to define clear positions early.


3) Mid-Cycle Redistricting Fight Moves to the Courts: Legal fights over congressional maps are intensifying in nearly a dozen states, with challenges and potential redraws in places like Virginia, New York, and Utah creating uncertainty just months before ballots are finalized. At the center is Louisiana v. Callais, a Supreme Court case that could alter Voting Rights Act protections governing minority-majority districts, while state courts weigh changes that could shift individual seats. Together, these rulings could redraw the battlefield late in the cycle and play a decisive role in determining control of the House.

 

National Sentiment Tracking

 

NIMBY RISING: DATA CENTERS TRIGGER LOCAL CONCERNS DESPITE BROAD INDIFFERENCE

A new POLITICO/Public First poll finds most Americans remain unfamiliar with data centers and largely neutral about their expansion nationwide, but support softens when projects are proposed locally. While respondents associate facilities with economic growth and job creation, concerns rise around electricity demand, water use, and community impacts when development occurs nearby.

The findings suggest public opinion is still fluid: the data center boom tied to AI and cloud computing is not yet politically polarized, but rising energy costs and infrastructure strain could quickly shift sentiment. Read More.

The poll surveyed 2,093 U.S. adults from Jan. 16 to 19, and has an overall margin of error of ±2 percentage points. Smaller subgroups have higher margins of error. Source: The POLITICO Poll with Public First Anna Wiederkehr/POLITICO

ONGOING AFFORDABILITY ANXIETY REMAINS THE DOMINANT CONCERNS FOR AMERICANS

A new YouGov–MarketWatch poll finds more than 80% of Americans say affordability has not improved, with nearly half saying it has worsened and only a small share reporting improvement. Rising costs for groceries, insurance, housing, and healthcare continue to strain household budgets, even as broader economic indicators stabilize.


Moreover, two-thirds of respondents say Washington is not taking affordability seriously, underscoring persistent frustration with political leaders and reinforcing cost-of-living pressures as the dominant voter concern heading into the election cycle. Read More.

HOUSE HIGHLIGHTS

DEMOCRATS BUILD EARLY FUNDRAISING EDGE

Democratic challengers are significantly outraising Republican challengers in the most competitive House districts, according to a Reuters analysis of campaign finance reports. In roughly 30 battleground races, Democratic candidates targeting GOP-held seats raised about $50 million combined, more than double the roughly $20 million raised by Republican challengers in Democratic-held districts.


The early financial advantage gives Democrats momentum as they seek to flip the few seats needed to reclaim the House majority, though incumbents from both parties continue to dominate overall fundraising, and outside spending remains a major wildcard. Read More. 

Polling At A Glance

Polling:
RCP Average Generic Ballot: 47.5 Dem - 42.7 GOP (D +4.8)

On this day in:

2022: 45.3 GOP - 42.0 Dem (R+3.3)
2018: 45.1 Dem - 37.1 GOP (D+8.0)

Retirements

Notable retirements from Congress are beginning to come out as the election year gets underway. The current total sits at 51 incumbent members (21 Democrats / 30 Republicans) of the House who have announced they are not seeking re-election. 


For context, during the first Trump term, there were 52 retirements from the House. 

Redistricting

MID-CYCLE REDISTRICTING FIGHT MOVES TO THE COURTS

Legal battles over congressional maps are accelerating across nearly a dozen states, with court rulings now poised to shape the House majority just months before the election. Lawsuits and redraw efforts in states including Missouri, Florida, Virginia, New York, Utah, and Wisconsin are creating uncertainty for campaigns and election officials as primary season approaches.


The most consequential case, Louisiana v. Callais, could reshape national maps by revisiting Voting Rights Act protections that influence majority-minority districts. While a decision is expected later this year, states are preparing for rapid redraws that could alter district lines on short notice. Read More.

UTAH REDISTRICTING RULING KEEPS DEMOCRATIC OPPORTUNITY ALIVE

A federal court rejected Republican efforts to block Utah’s court-ordered congressional map, clearing the way for districts that could give Democrats a viable path to one of the state’s four House seats in 2026. The map consolidates Democratic-leaning Salt Lake County rather than splitting it across multiple districts, and the court declined to intervene so close to the election calendar. The decision underscores how court rulings, even in reliably Republican states, are actively reshaping competitiveness and could influence the fight for House control. Read More.

SENATE HIGHLIGHTS

Retirements

So far, 9 Senators have announced their retirement from the chamber at the end of the current Congress. 


TEXAS GOP SENATE PRIMARY INTENSIFIES AS EARLY VOTING BEGINS

Early voting is underway in Texas’s high-stakes Republican Senate primary, where incumbent Sen. John Cornyn faces strong challenges from Attorney General Ken Paxton and Rep. Wesley Hunt in what could be the toughest race of Cornyn’s career. Recent polling shows Paxton leading with roughly 38% support, followed by Cornyn and Hunt, with a runoff widely expected if no candidate secures a majority.


The contest has grown increasingly combative, with candidates attacking one another’s records and positioning themselves as the strongest conservative voice, while heavy advertising spending and national attention underscore the seat’s importance.


Why it matters: The primary highlights ideological divisions within the Texas GOP and could shape general-election competitiveness in a critical Senate race, making the outcome consequential for national party strategy and Senate control. Read More.


Polling At A Glance

Recent Polls
Change Research (NC General) Cooper (D) 50, Whatley (R) 40
Quantus Insights (GA GOP Primary) Collins 36, Carter 11, Dooley 9

IN THE STATES

MICHIGAN SPECIAL ELECTION DRAWS NATIONAL ATTENTION

Democrats are pouring resources into the May special election for Michigan’s 35th state Senate district, viewing the race as critical to maintaining control of the chamber and as an early test of voter sentiment ahead of the midterms. The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee has labeled it a “spotlight” contest, underscoring its strategic importance.


The outcome could shape legislative power in Lansing for the remainder of the year while offering an early signal of turnout dynamics and party momentum heading into 2026. Read More.

EMERGING NARRATIVES

SUPREME COURT TARIFF RULING RESHAPES TRADE AUTHORITY

The Supreme Court struck down the administration’s sweeping global tariffs, ruling the president exceeded emergency powers and reaffirming that Congress holds authority over tariff policy. The decision disrupts a central economic tool, raises questions about refunds on collected duties, and signals that future trade actions will face greater legal scrutiny even as the White House explores alternative tariff pathways.


Tariffs and their impact on consumer costs and supply chains remain politically salient, but future actions are likely to be more contentious and procedurally constrained. Read More.

SPECIAL-INTEREST MONEY IS SHAPING THE TECH POLICY AGENDA

Outside spending tied to artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency policy is rapidly scaling ahead of the midterms, signaling a new phase of issue advocacy centered on emerging technologies. Millions of dollars in ads are seeking to shape public opinion on AI regulation, with competing campaigns framing oversight as either essential consumer protection or a threat to U.S. innovation and competitiveness.


At the same time, the cryptocurrency industry has amassed a massive political war chest, approaching $200 million, to support candidates aligned with its regulatory priorities and oppose critics, underscoring its growing influence in congressional races.


Technology policy is becoming a major battleground for outside spending, with well-funded industry groups working to shape both election outcomes and the regulatory environment. As AI governance and digital asset rules move toward the center of economic policy debates, special-interest investment is accelerating the nationalization of these issues and elevating them as defining campaign narratives in 2026.

ON THE HORIZON

Upcoming Elections:


March 3:
Arkansas, North Carolina, Texas


March 10:
Mississippi


March 17:
Illinois


March 31:
Arkansas Runoff


April 16:
NJ-11 Special General

By Ashlee Stephenson August 13, 2026
Public Affairs Has a Performance Problem There is a hard truth our industry doesn't like to admit. Public affairs has become far too comfortable confusing activity with accomplishment. Too many firms celebrate meetings instead of momentum. They count bill introductions instead of policy victories. They send clients long recaps filled with updates everyone could have read themselves and call it strategy. That isn't advocacy. That's administration. Clients aren't hiring us to tell them what happened in Washington yesterday. They're hiring us to change what happens tomorrow. Somewhere along the way, much of our industry accepted that checking the box was enough. Weekly reports became the deliverable. Legislative summaries became the strategy. Calendar invites became evidence of value. Meanwhile, the companies paying the bills are facing the fastest-moving policy environment in decades. Artificial Intelligence Trade Tariffs Tax Policy Energy Workforce Shortages Antitrust China ESG Supply Chains State Activism Election Volatility The stakes have never been higher. Yet many public affairs programs are operating exactly as they did fifteen years ago. That should concern every CEO. Effort Isn't a KPI One of the biggest myths in our profession is that effort equals value. It doesn't. Clients don't care how many meetings you scheduled. They care whether their issue moved. They don't care how many memos you wrote. They care whether the narrative changed. They don't care how busy your team looked. They care whether they are better positioned because of your work. Being busy has become a substitute for being effective. The two are not the same. The Next Generation of Public Affairs The firms that will define the next decade won't be the ones with the biggest lobbying teams. They'll be the ones that integrate policy, communications, research, digital strategy, coalition building, and executive positioning into one coordinated campaign. Public affairs isn't just government relations anymore. It’s: Business Strategy Market Strategy Reputation Management Competitive Advantage The firms still operating in silos will be left behind. Relationships Matter. Initiative Matters More. Relationships remain the currency of influence. But relationships alone are no longer enough. Clients expect: Ideas before they ask for them Opportunities before they appear Intelligence before it becomes news Their advisors to think like business leaders - not order takers The firms creating the most value today aren't waiting for assignments. They are creating opportunities. Raise the Standard This profession deserves better than status updates disguised as strategy. It deserves: Curiosity Creativity Relentless preparation A bias toward action An obsession with producing measurable outcomes Our clients don't need more emails. They don't need another legislative summary. They need partners willing to challenge conventional thinking, anticipate what's next, and fight relentlessly for results. That's the standard. It should be the expectation - not the exception.
By Bob Salera August 3, 2026
Firm significantly expands its presence in the nation's largest state economy, offering clients a fully integrated federal, state, local, and public affairs platform.
July 28, 2026
SNAPSHOT
July 15, 2026
SNAPSHOT
By Bob Salera July 9, 2026
The DSA Surge: What Socialist Primary Wins Mean for Business and the Policy Landscape  In the span of two election cycles, the Democratic Socialists of America have gone from insurgent outsiders to a genuine force inside the Democratic Party. A new analysis of DSA's national endorsement record shows 25 primary wins across 15 states so far in the 2025-2026 cycle, a 62 percent success rate stretching from New York city councils to congressional primaries in Pennsylvania and Colorado. The trend is accelerating, and its implications run well beyond the halls of Congress. A Narrow Majority and a Familiar Problem The most immediate political concern is what happens on Capitol Hill if Democrats win the House with a thin margin. Hakeem Jeffries would face the same arithmetic Kevin McCarthy encountered with the House Freedom Caucus: a small group of ideologically committed members can hold a majority hostage. McCarthy was driven from the speakership in October 2023 by fewer than ten members. A larger DSA-aligned caucus, operating from the opposite end of the spectrum with fresh electoral mandates and no institutional loyalty to leadership, could prove equally disruptive. The Squad has already shown a willingness to break with Democratic leadership on appropriations, foreign policy, and procedural votes. More members with the same ideological profile and stronger grassroots backing would only amplify that dynamic. The Bigger Story Is Not Congress Congress gets the attention, but state legislatures and local governments set the conditions in which businesses actually operate. DSA candidates have won primaries in Georgia's state house, Minnesota's city councils, and city councils from New Jersey to Wisconsin to Arizona. These offices are pipelines. Today's Ithaca city councilmember is tomorrow's state legislator. The ideology rarely moderates as candidates advance. DSA's tracker shows an overall candidate win rate just above 50 percent since 2016, but the trend line matters: their 2025 cycle rate hit 62 percent, among the highest in their history. They are getting better at targeting winnable races, recruiting credible candidates, and turning out their base in low-turnout primaries where a motivated minority can determine outcomes. What It Means for Business in Blue States DSA's platform is not a vague progressive wish list. It calls for high progressive taxation, aggressive labor mandates, rent control, restructuring or defunding police, and opposition to most market-rate development. In jurisdictions where DSA-backed officials hold real power, those positions have translated into tangible policy. Minneapolis, where DSA holds several city council seats, has moved aggressively on landlord restrictions and business tax increases. San Francisco, where DSA-backed supervisor Dean Preston held power for years, saw some of the most restrictive commercial policies of any major American city before his 2024 defeat. Chicago's DSA aldermanic bloc has been a consistent source of opposition to development and public safety investment. These are not abstract ideological disputes. They represent direct compliance costs, operational risk, and a fundamentally less hospitable environment for investment. The National Drag, the State-Level Threat Nationally, a Democratic Party increasingly defined by its socialist wing faces real structural vulnerabilities. The 2024 results underscored how badly economic anxiety and perceptions of ideological overreach damage Democrats with working-class voters. An overtly socialist brand does not win back those voters. In competitive states and districts, it is a liability. But DSA does not need to win nationally to reshape policy. In blue states, a narrow legislative majority is enough to pass sweeping changes to tax policy, labor law, zoning, and regulatory structure. The voters most affected by those policies often have no political recourse. They cannot flip the state, and moving is not always an option. The Bottom Line DSA's electoral growth is not a narrative. It is a documented trend with a consistent track record across eight years and nearly 300 tracked candidates. For business and advocacy organizations, the lesson is that down-ballot primaries are where the policy environment is actually determined. A city council race in Milwaukee or a state house primary in Georgia does not generate national headlines, but it shapes the regulatory and tax climate that affects daily operations. Monitoring these races, engaging early, and understanding who holds office at every level of government matters more now than at any point in recent memory. The decisions being made in city council chambers today are the legislation being voted on in state capitals in five years.
By Ashlee Stephenson July 7, 2026
President Ashlee Rich Stephenson joined Steve Scully on SiriusXM POTUS to discuss the U.S. Senate landscape. Ashlee stated, "If I'm a Democratic operative, I'm hoping Haley Stevens pulls this out. Nominating a Democratic Socialist of America-backed candidate to run statewide in a true battleground would present real challenges for Democrats. If we start seeing Democratic Socialist of America candidates winning Senate nominations in states like Michigan, it signals a broader shift with implications that extend to the Electoral College, the presidency, and the future of free enterprise." And prior to the breaking news on Platner re-evaluating his campaign, they also covered Maine's Senate race, where Ashlee argued that Sen. Susan Collins remains in a strong position. Collins' long-standing reputation and the value Mainers place on character make the race far more challenging for Democrats than many expected, turning what was once viewed as a top pickup opportunity into a much more difficult path. Watch the full analysis of the 2026 U.S. Senate landscape here: