AxIndex, Edition 8

 

SNAPSHOT

 

Our Top 3:


1) Money Is Flooding the Map, But the Battlefield Is Narrowing
Q1 fundraising underscores a clear trend: both parties are entering the midterms with significant financial firepower, but Republicans maintain a structural advantage through outside groups and cash on hand. The NRCC posted a record-breaking quarter, while GOP-aligned super PACs are planning nearly $350 million to defend the Senate. At the same time, Democrats are often outraising Republicans at the candidate level in key battlegrounds. The result is a high-dollar cycle focused on a shrinking universe of truly competitive races, where outside spending and resource allocation will likely determine control.


2) Democratic Overperformance Is Real, and the Map Is Starting to Respond
Democrats have overperformed 2024 benchmarks in roughly 85% of special elections since Trump took office, including flips in deep-red districts and a win in a Florida seat covering Mar-a-Lago. That momentum is beginning to show up in the broader landscape, with key Senate races shifting left and Republicans facing a more difficult national environment tied to Trump’s approval and economic concerns. While the path to a Senate majority remains narrow, the trajectory is improving for Democrats. The big question now is whether these early signals translate to higher-turnout midterm conditions.


3) Redistricting Wars Enter the Final Stretch 

Virginia and Florida have emerged as the last major redistricting battlegrounds before the midterms, with both parties attempting aggressive mid-decade map changes to gain an edge. In Virginia, Democrats are pushing a referendum that could net up to four seats, backed by tens of millions in outside spending and high-profile surrogates, including ads featuring Obama. In Florida, Republicans are weighing new maps amid legal constraints and internal concerns about overreach. With limited time before filing deadlines and primaries, these late-stage map fights could meaningfully shape the House battlefield, and may be one of the last opportunities to structurally shift the map before November.

 

National Sentiment Tracking

 

Democratic Overperformance in Special Elections Signals Shifting Environment

A new analysis of 229 elections since President Donald Trump took office shows Democrats consistently outperforming their 2024 baseline, with candidates exceeding former Vice President Kamala Harris’ margins in roughly 85% of races. On average, Democrats are running about 5 points stronger, with some special elections swinging dramatically, even in districts Trump carried, suggesting broad-based movement rather than isolated gains.


While both parties caution that low-turnout special elections are an imperfect predictor of midterm outcomes, the trend mirrors past cycles where early overperformance foreshadowed major shifts. Democrats attribute gains to energized turnout and a focus on affordability issues, while Republicans argue the dynamics will change in higher-turnout elections. Still, the consistency across states and districts points to a political environment that has moved leftward since 2024, raising the stakes for both parties heading into 2026. Read More.

Support for Iran Strikes Stagnant as GOP Divides Deepen

Public opinion on the Iran conflict remains tepid, with just 35% of Americans approving of U.S. military strikes, a figure that has held steady over the past month. Separate polling shows only about a quarter of Americans believe the war has been worth the costs, reinforcing broader skepticism as the conflict drags on.


The data also highlights emerging fractures within the Republican coalition. Younger Republicans are significantly less supportive of the strikes than those over 45, adding to divides between MAGA and non-MAGA voters. With soft support, even within the GOP base, the issue could present messaging challenges as the midterms approach. Read More.

HOUSE HIGHLIGHTS

Polling At A Glance

House
RCP Average Generic Ballot: 47.6 Dem - 41.6 GOP (D +6.0)
On this day in:

2022: 46.1 GOP - 42.5 Dem (R+3.6)

2018: 46.3 Dem - 38.8 GOP (D+7.5)

Retirements

For context, during the first Trump term, there were 52 retirements from the House. 

Swalwell, Gonzales Resign Ahead of Expulsion Votes

Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) resigned from Congress just before the House was expected to move forward with expulsion votes over separate sexual misconduct scandals. Facing bipartisan pressure and looming ethics investigations, both lawmakers stepped down to avoid a rare and highly public removal process.


Their departures reflect a growing willingness from members of both parties to push for accountability, particularly in cases involving misconduct. At the same time, the episode underscores the challenges House leaders face in balancing due process, political realities, and maintaining a razor-thin majority, with additional ethics cases still pending. Read More.

Progressive Democrat Wins NJ Special Election, Reinforcing Party Momentum

Progressive activist Analilia Mejia defeated Republican Joe Hathaway 60–40 in a New Jersey special election, continuing a streak of Democratic overperformance heading into the 2026 midterms. The race, called minutes after polls closed, fills a seat vacated by Gov. Mikie Sherrill and keeps a once-competitive district firmly in Democratic hands.


Despite significant outside spending against her in the primary, Mejia's victory highlights both grassroots energy and shifting dynamics within the Democratic coalition. While Republicans downplayed the result given low turnout, the margin adds to a broader pattern of Democratic strength in special elections, offering another early signal of the political environment ahead of November. Read More.

House GOP Posts Record Fundraising as Both Parties Claim Momentum

House Republicans are touting a record-breaking $47.1 million first-quarter fundraising haul through the NRCC, narrowly outpacing Democrats and signaling strong donor engagement as they work to defend a slim majority. GOP leaders argue the numbers reflect confidence in their ability to withstand traditional midterm headwinds, with President Donald Trump playing a central role in energizing donors and campaign infrastructure.


Still, the broader picture remains competitive. Democrats are close behind in fundraising and point to strong candidate performance and overperformance in recent elections as evidence of their own momentum. With economic concerns continuing to dominate voter sentiment, both parties are entering the cycle well-funded and framing the midterms as a referendum on economic leadership, setting up a tightly contested fight for control of the House. Read More.

Redistricting

Virginia Redistricting Vote Marked by Confusion and Heavy Spending

Virginia’s high-stakes redistricting referendum heads to voters on April 21, but widespread confusion over ballot language, dueling ads, and competing campaign names is clouding the issue.


Both sides are accusing each other of misleading voters, while contradictory messaging, from TV spots to mailers, has made it difficult for many to understand what a “yes” or “no” vote actually means.


Behind the confusion is a flood of outside spending, with more than $60 million, largely from dark-money groups, powering the pro-redistricting campaign alone. The proposed map could shift multiple House seats toward Democrats, raising the national stakes. With turnout uncertain, analysts say the outcome may ultimately hinge less on persuasion and more on which side can better mobilize voters in the final days. Read More.

Florida Redistricting Session Delayed as Stakes and Scope Expand

Florida’s special session on redistricting has been delayed one week, with Gov. Ron DeSantis pushing it to April 28 while signaling he will take the lead on proposing new congressional maps. The delay adds uncertainty to one of the final major redistricting battlegrounds, where Republicans are considering mid-decade changes to help maintain control of the House.


DeSantis is also using the session to revive stalled priorities, including expanded vaccine exemptions and an “AI Bill of Rights,” broadening the scope beyond redistricting. The process is expected to face significant legal challenges, and the timing, combined with White House interest in reshaping maps, underscores the high political stakes heading into the 2026 midterms. Read More.

SENATE HIGHLIGHTS

Polling At A Glance

Recent Polls


Co/efficient (TX GOP Runoff): Cornyn (i) 44, Paxton (R) 43
Data for Progress (MI Dem Primary): Stevens 23, McMorrow 22, El-Sayed 22
Emerson (MI Dem Primary): McMorrow 24, El-Sayed 24, Stevens 13
Boston Globe/Suffolk (MA Dem Primary): Markey (i) 47, Moulton 30
High Point/YouGov (NC General): Cooper (D) 50, Whatley (R) 42



Cook Ratings

Likely D: MN (Open D)
Lean D: GA (Ossoff) NC (Open R), NH (Open D)
Tossup: ME (Collins - R), MI (Open - D), OH - Special (Husted)
Lean R: AK (Sullivan)
Likely R: IA (Open - R), NE (Ricketts), TX (Cornyn)


Retirements

So far, 11 Senators have announced their retirement from the chamber at the end of the current Congress.

Cook Shifts Senate Map Toward Democrats, But GOP Still Poised to Hold Slim Control

The Cook Political Report shifted four Senate races toward Democrats, citing a worsening national environment for Republicans, but still projects the GOP as the favorite to retain control of the chamber. Key moves include North Carolina and Georgia shifting to “Lean Democrat,” while Ohio moved to “Toss Up” and Nebraska to “Lean Republican,” signaling a more competitive map.


Despite the movement, structural advantages still favor Republicans, with Democrats needing four seats to win a majority and facing challenging races and primary divisions in several states. Analysts point to President Donald Trump’s declining approval ratings and issues such as the war in Iran and rising costs as headwinds for the GOP, but note that the outlook could shift depending on political and economic conditions in the months ahead. Read More.



Democrats Lead Candidate Fundraising as GOP Leans on Outside Money

Democratic candidates are outraising their Republican counterparts across nearly every major Senate battleground, including significant advantages in states like Texas, Georgia, and Ohio. High-profile races show wide gaps, with candidates like James Talarico, Jon Ossoff, and Sherrod Brown bringing in substantially more through their campaign committees.


However, Republicans are offsetting that disadvantage with a strong edge in outside spending, as GOP-aligned super PACs and donor networks pour millions into key races. The split highlights a defining dynamic of the 2026 cycle: Democrats are building strength at the candidate level, while Republicans rely on well-funded outside groups to defend their majority in a competitive map. Read More.


MAHA Movement Faces Early Test in Louisiana Senate Race

The “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement is getting its first real electoral test in Louisiana’s Senate primary, but early signs suggest limited impact. Despite endorsing Rep. Julia Letlow and pledging support, MAHA-affiliated groups have spent relatively little and failed to consolidate backing, while the race remains dominated by traditional GOP dynamics, particularly loyalty to Donald Trump and cost-of-living concerns.


The fragmented approach and modest resources raise questions about MAHA’s ability to translate its grassroots energy into political influence ahead of the midterms. While the movement has ambitions to shape races nationally, its uneven presence in Louisiana suggests it may remain more aligned with Trump’s coalition than a standalone force. Read More.

IN THE STATES

States Push Back as Data Center Boom Sparks Midterm Tensions

Data center expansion is quickly becoming a state-level political flashpoint, with at least 11 states introducing legislation to restrict or halt development amid growing concerns over power usage, water strain, and local infrastructure. Maine is on track to become the first state to impose a temporary ban, while others are exploring limits tied to environmental impact, energy costs, and consumer protections, signaling a broader wave of state-led action in the absence of federal policy. 


The issue is cutting across party lines, forcing governors and state lawmakers to balance economic growth and AI investment against rising constituent backlash. With proposals ranging from outright moratoriums to tighter regulations, how states respond could shape not only local economies but also national political narratives around energy, affordability, and technological expansion heading into 2026. Read More.

EMERGING NARRATIVES

The Check-Writers: Self-Funders Flood 2026 Congressional Races

Wealthy candidates are betting their own fortunes on congressional seats across the country in 2026. In Maryland's 6th District, David Trone, co-founder of Total Wine & More and one of the biggest self-funders in congressional history, has already poured more than $10 million into a primary challenge against the incumbent he personally endorsed to succeed him (read more). In San Francisco, former AOC chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti has self-funded nearly $5 million chasing Nancy Pelosi's open seat while raising just $61,000 from actual donors so far this year (read more). Three Democrats in New Jersey’s competitive 7th District primary enter the final stretch with similar cash on hand, but only Rebecca Bennett built her war chest entirely from donor fundraising, while her opponents rely heavily on self-funding (read more).

The pattern reflects a broader trend that has reshaped congressional campaigns for years. Self-funding candidates cashed in millions to their own races in recent cycles, and 2026 is on pace to continue that momentum. But the track record is uneven at best. Just look at David Trone; he spent over $60 million in the 2024 Maryland Senate primary and lost by 11 points. Money buys airtime. It doesn't always buy votes.

ON THE HORIZON

Upcoming Elections:


April 21:
Virginia Redistricting Amendment


May 5:
Indiana Primary
Ohio Primary


May 12:
Nebraska Primary
West Virginia Primary
North Carolina Runoff


May 16:
Louisiana Primary


May 19:
Alabama Primary
Georgia Primary
Idaho Primary
Kentucky Primary
Oregon Primary
Pennsylvania Primary


By Bob Salera September 1, 2026
AxAdvocacy Expands to Ohio with Addition of Former State Representative Jon Cross as Principal Firm’s Columbus practice marks its latest expansion into key state capitals
By Ashlee Stephenson August 13, 2026
Public Affairs Has a Performance Problem There is a hard truth our industry doesn't like to admit. Public affairs has become far too comfortable confusing activity with accomplishment. Too many firms celebrate meetings instead of momentum. They count bill introductions instead of policy victories. They send clients long recaps filled with updates everyone could have read themselves and call it strategy. That isn't advocacy. That's administration. Clients aren't hiring us to tell them what happened in Washington yesterday. They're hiring us to change what happens tomorrow. Somewhere along the way, much of our industry accepted that checking the box was enough. Weekly reports became the deliverable. Legislative summaries became the strategy. Calendar invites became evidence of value. Meanwhile, the companies paying the bills are facing the fastest-moving policy environment in decades. Artificial Intelligence Trade Tariffs Tax Policy Energy Workforce Shortages Antitrust China ESG Supply Chains State Activism Election Volatility The stakes have never been higher. Yet many public affairs programs are operating exactly as they did fifteen years ago. That should concern every CEO. Effort Isn't a KPI One of the biggest myths in our profession is that effort equals value. It doesn't. Clients don't care how many meetings you scheduled. They care whether their issue moved. They don't care how many memos you wrote. They care whether the narrative changed. They don't care how busy your team looked. They care whether they are better positioned because of your work. Being busy has become a substitute for being effective. The two are not the same. The Next Generation of Public Affairs The firms that will define the next decade won't be the ones with the biggest lobbying teams. They'll be the ones that integrate policy, communications, research, digital strategy, coalition building, and executive positioning into one coordinated campaign. Public affairs isn't just government relations anymore. It’s: Business Strategy Market Strategy Reputation Management Competitive Advantage The firms still operating in silos will be left behind. Relationships Matter. Initiative Matters More. Relationships remain the currency of influence. But relationships alone are no longer enough. Clients expect: Ideas before they ask for them Opportunities before they appear Intelligence before it becomes news Their advisors to think like business leaders - not order takers The firms creating the most value today aren't waiting for assignments. They are creating opportunities. Raise the Standard This profession deserves better than status updates disguised as strategy. It deserves: Curiosity Creativity Relentless preparation A bias toward action An obsession with producing measurable outcomes Our clients don't need more emails. They don't need another legislative summary. They need partners willing to challenge conventional thinking, anticipate what's next, and fight relentlessly for results. That's the standard. It should be the expectation - not the exception.
By Bob Salera August 3, 2026
Firm significantly expands its presence in the nation's largest state economy, offering clients a fully integrated federal, state, local, and public affairs platform.
July 28, 2026
SNAPSHOT
July 15, 2026
SNAPSHOT
By Bob Salera July 9, 2026
The DSA Surge: What Socialist Primary Wins Mean for Business and the Policy Landscape  In the span of two election cycles, the Democratic Socialists of America have gone from insurgent outsiders to a genuine force inside the Democratic Party. A new analysis of DSA's national endorsement record shows 25 primary wins across 15 states so far in the 2025-2026 cycle, a 62 percent success rate stretching from New York city councils to congressional primaries in Pennsylvania and Colorado. The trend is accelerating, and its implications run well beyond the halls of Congress. A Narrow Majority and a Familiar Problem The most immediate political concern is what happens on Capitol Hill if Democrats win the House with a thin margin. Hakeem Jeffries would face the same arithmetic Kevin McCarthy encountered with the House Freedom Caucus: a small group of ideologically committed members can hold a majority hostage. McCarthy was driven from the speakership in October 2023 by fewer than ten members. A larger DSA-aligned caucus, operating from the opposite end of the spectrum with fresh electoral mandates and no institutional loyalty to leadership, could prove equally disruptive. The Squad has already shown a willingness to break with Democratic leadership on appropriations, foreign policy, and procedural votes. More members with the same ideological profile and stronger grassroots backing would only amplify that dynamic. The Bigger Story Is Not Congress Congress gets the attention, but state legislatures and local governments set the conditions in which businesses actually operate. DSA candidates have won primaries in Georgia's state house, Minnesota's city councils, and city councils from New Jersey to Wisconsin to Arizona. These offices are pipelines. Today's Ithaca city councilmember is tomorrow's state legislator. The ideology rarely moderates as candidates advance. DSA's tracker shows an overall candidate win rate just above 50 percent since 2016, but the trend line matters: their 2025 cycle rate hit 62 percent, among the highest in their history. They are getting better at targeting winnable races, recruiting credible candidates, and turning out their base in low-turnout primaries where a motivated minority can determine outcomes. What It Means for Business in Blue States DSA's platform is not a vague progressive wish list. It calls for high progressive taxation, aggressive labor mandates, rent control, restructuring or defunding police, and opposition to most market-rate development. In jurisdictions where DSA-backed officials hold real power, those positions have translated into tangible policy. Minneapolis, where DSA holds several city council seats, has moved aggressively on landlord restrictions and business tax increases. San Francisco, where DSA-backed supervisor Dean Preston held power for years, saw some of the most restrictive commercial policies of any major American city before his 2024 defeat. Chicago's DSA aldermanic bloc has been a consistent source of opposition to development and public safety investment. These are not abstract ideological disputes. They represent direct compliance costs, operational risk, and a fundamentally less hospitable environment for investment. The National Drag, the State-Level Threat Nationally, a Democratic Party increasingly defined by its socialist wing faces real structural vulnerabilities. The 2024 results underscored how badly economic anxiety and perceptions of ideological overreach damage Democrats with working-class voters. An overtly socialist brand does not win back those voters. In competitive states and districts, it is a liability. But DSA does not need to win nationally to reshape policy. In blue states, a narrow legislative majority is enough to pass sweeping changes to tax policy, labor law, zoning, and regulatory structure. The voters most affected by those policies often have no political recourse. They cannot flip the state, and moving is not always an option. The Bottom Line DSA's electoral growth is not a narrative. It is a documented trend with a consistent track record across eight years and nearly 300 tracked candidates. For business and advocacy organizations, the lesson is that down-ballot primaries are where the policy environment is actually determined. A city council race in Milwaukee or a state house primary in Georgia does not generate national headlines, but it shapes the regulatory and tax climate that affects daily operations. Monitoring these races, engaging early, and understanding who holds office at every level of government matters more now than at any point in recent memory. The decisions being made in city council chambers today are the legislation being voted on in state capitals in five years.