AxIndex, Edition 8

 

SNAPSHOT

 

Our Top 3:


1) Money Is Flooding the Map, But the Battlefield Is Narrowing
Q1 fundraising underscores a clear trend: both parties are entering the midterms with significant financial firepower, but Republicans maintain a structural advantage through outside groups and cash on hand. The NRCC posted a record-breaking quarter, while GOP-aligned super PACs are planning nearly $350 million to defend the Senate. At the same time, Democrats are often outraising Republicans at the candidate level in key battlegrounds. The result is a high-dollar cycle focused on a shrinking universe of truly competitive races, where outside spending and resource allocation will likely determine control.


2) Democratic Overperformance Is Real, and the Map Is Starting to Respond
Democrats have overperformed 2024 benchmarks in roughly 85% of special elections since Trump took office, including flips in deep-red districts and a win in a Florida seat covering Mar-a-Lago. That momentum is beginning to show up in the broader landscape, with key Senate races shifting left and Republicans facing a more difficult national environment tied to Trump’s approval and economic concerns. While the path to a Senate majority remains narrow, the trajectory is improving for Democrats. The big question now is whether these early signals translate to higher-turnout midterm conditions.


3) Redistricting Wars Enter the Final Stretch 

Virginia and Florida have emerged as the last major redistricting battlegrounds before the midterms, with both parties attempting aggressive mid-decade map changes to gain an edge. In Virginia, Democrats are pushing a referendum that could net up to four seats, backed by tens of millions in outside spending and high-profile surrogates, including ads featuring Obama. In Florida, Republicans are weighing new maps amid legal constraints and internal concerns about overreach. With limited time before filing deadlines and primaries, these late-stage map fights could meaningfully shape the House battlefield, and may be one of the last opportunities to structurally shift the map before November.

 

National Sentiment Tracking

 

Democratic Overperformance in Special Elections Signals Shifting Environment

A new analysis of 229 elections since President Donald Trump took office shows Democrats consistently outperforming their 2024 baseline, with candidates exceeding former Vice President Kamala Harris’ margins in roughly 85% of races. On average, Democrats are running about 5 points stronger, with some special elections swinging dramatically, even in districts Trump carried, suggesting broad-based movement rather than isolated gains.


While both parties caution that low-turnout special elections are an imperfect predictor of midterm outcomes, the trend mirrors past cycles where early overperformance foreshadowed major shifts. Democrats attribute gains to energized turnout and a focus on affordability issues, while Republicans argue the dynamics will change in higher-turnout elections. Still, the consistency across states and districts points to a political environment that has moved leftward since 2024, raising the stakes for both parties heading into 2026. Read More.

Support for Iran Strikes Stagnant as GOP Divides Deepen

Public opinion on the Iran conflict remains tepid, with just 35% of Americans approving of U.S. military strikes, a figure that has held steady over the past month. Separate polling shows only about a quarter of Americans believe the war has been worth the costs, reinforcing broader skepticism as the conflict drags on.


The data also highlights emerging fractures within the Republican coalition. Younger Republicans are significantly less supportive of the strikes than those over 45, adding to divides between MAGA and non-MAGA voters. With soft support, even within the GOP base, the issue could present messaging challenges as the midterms approach. Read More.

HOUSE HIGHLIGHTS

Polling At A Glance

House
RCP Average Generic Ballot: 47.6 Dem - 41.6 GOP (D +6.0)
On this day in:

2022: 46.1 GOP - 42.5 Dem (R+3.6)

2018: 46.3 Dem - 38.8 GOP (D+7.5)

Retirements

For context, during the first Trump term, there were 52 retirements from the House. 

Swalwell, Gonzales Resign Ahead of Expulsion Votes

Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) resigned from Congress just before the House was expected to move forward with expulsion votes over separate sexual misconduct scandals. Facing bipartisan pressure and looming ethics investigations, both lawmakers stepped down to avoid a rare and highly public removal process.


Their departures reflect a growing willingness from members of both parties to push for accountability, particularly in cases involving misconduct. At the same time, the episode underscores the challenges House leaders face in balancing due process, political realities, and maintaining a razor-thin majority, with additional ethics cases still pending. Read More.

Progressive Democrat Wins NJ Special Election, Reinforcing Party Momentum

Progressive activist Analilia Mejia defeated Republican Joe Hathaway 60–40 in a New Jersey special election, continuing a streak of Democratic overperformance heading into the 2026 midterms. The race, called minutes after polls closed, fills a seat vacated by Gov. Mikie Sherrill and keeps a once-competitive district firmly in Democratic hands.


Despite significant outside spending against her in the primary, Mejia's victory highlights both grassroots energy and shifting dynamics within the Democratic coalition. While Republicans downplayed the result given low turnout, the margin adds to a broader pattern of Democratic strength in special elections, offering another early signal of the political environment ahead of November. Read More.

House GOP Posts Record Fundraising as Both Parties Claim Momentum

House Republicans are touting a record-breaking $47.1 million first-quarter fundraising haul through the NRCC, narrowly outpacing Democrats and signaling strong donor engagement as they work to defend a slim majority. GOP leaders argue the numbers reflect confidence in their ability to withstand traditional midterm headwinds, with President Donald Trump playing a central role in energizing donors and campaign infrastructure.


Still, the broader picture remains competitive. Democrats are close behind in fundraising and point to strong candidate performance and overperformance in recent elections as evidence of their own momentum. With economic concerns continuing to dominate voter sentiment, both parties are entering the cycle well-funded and framing the midterms as a referendum on economic leadership, setting up a tightly contested fight for control of the House. Read More.

Redistricting

Virginia Redistricting Vote Marked by Confusion and Heavy Spending

Virginia’s high-stakes redistricting referendum heads to voters on April 21, but widespread confusion over ballot language, dueling ads, and competing campaign names is clouding the issue.


Both sides are accusing each other of misleading voters, while contradictory messaging, from TV spots to mailers, has made it difficult for many to understand what a “yes” or “no” vote actually means.


Behind the confusion is a flood of outside spending, with more than $60 million, largely from dark-money groups, powering the pro-redistricting campaign alone. The proposed map could shift multiple House seats toward Democrats, raising the national stakes. With turnout uncertain, analysts say the outcome may ultimately hinge less on persuasion and more on which side can better mobilize voters in the final days. Read More.

Florida Redistricting Session Delayed as Stakes and Scope Expand

Florida’s special session on redistricting has been delayed one week, with Gov. Ron DeSantis pushing it to April 28 while signaling he will take the lead on proposing new congressional maps. The delay adds uncertainty to one of the final major redistricting battlegrounds, where Republicans are considering mid-decade changes to help maintain control of the House.


DeSantis is also using the session to revive stalled priorities, including expanded vaccine exemptions and an “AI Bill of Rights,” broadening the scope beyond redistricting. The process is expected to face significant legal challenges, and the timing, combined with White House interest in reshaping maps, underscores the high political stakes heading into the 2026 midterms. Read More.

SENATE HIGHLIGHTS

Polling At A Glance

Recent Polls


Co/efficient (TX GOP Runoff): Cornyn (i) 44, Paxton (R) 43
Data for Progress (MI Dem Primary): Stevens 23, McMorrow 22, El-Sayed 22
Emerson (MI Dem Primary): McMorrow 24, El-Sayed 24, Stevens 13
Boston Globe/Suffolk (MA Dem Primary): Markey (i) 47, Moulton 30
High Point/YouGov (NC General): Cooper (D) 50, Whatley (R) 42



Cook Ratings

Likely D: MN (Open D)
Lean D: GA (Ossoff) NC (Open R), NH (Open D)
Tossup: ME (Collins - R), MI (Open - D), OH - Special (Husted)
Lean R: AK (Sullivan)
Likely R: IA (Open - R), NE (Ricketts), TX (Cornyn)


Retirements

So far, 11 Senators have announced their retirement from the chamber at the end of the current Congress.

Cook Shifts Senate Map Toward Democrats, But GOP Still Poised to Hold Slim Control

The Cook Political Report shifted four Senate races toward Democrats, citing a worsening national environment for Republicans, but still projects the GOP as the favorite to retain control of the chamber. Key moves include North Carolina and Georgia shifting to “Lean Democrat,” while Ohio moved to “Toss Up” and Nebraska to “Lean Republican,” signaling a more competitive map.


Despite the movement, structural advantages still favor Republicans, with Democrats needing four seats to win a majority and facing challenging races and primary divisions in several states. Analysts point to President Donald Trump’s declining approval ratings and issues such as the war in Iran and rising costs as headwinds for the GOP, but note that the outlook could shift depending on political and economic conditions in the months ahead. Read More.



Democrats Lead Candidate Fundraising as GOP Leans on Outside Money

Democratic candidates are outraising their Republican counterparts across nearly every major Senate battleground, including significant advantages in states like Texas, Georgia, and Ohio. High-profile races show wide gaps, with candidates like James Talarico, Jon Ossoff, and Sherrod Brown bringing in substantially more through their campaign committees.


However, Republicans are offsetting that disadvantage with a strong edge in outside spending, as GOP-aligned super PACs and donor networks pour millions into key races. The split highlights a defining dynamic of the 2026 cycle: Democrats are building strength at the candidate level, while Republicans rely on well-funded outside groups to defend their majority in a competitive map. Read More.


MAHA Movement Faces Early Test in Louisiana Senate Race

The “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement is getting its first real electoral test in Louisiana’s Senate primary, but early signs suggest limited impact. Despite endorsing Rep. Julia Letlow and pledging support, MAHA-affiliated groups have spent relatively little and failed to consolidate backing, while the race remains dominated by traditional GOP dynamics, particularly loyalty to Donald Trump and cost-of-living concerns.


The fragmented approach and modest resources raise questions about MAHA’s ability to translate its grassroots energy into political influence ahead of the midterms. While the movement has ambitions to shape races nationally, its uneven presence in Louisiana suggests it may remain more aligned with Trump’s coalition than a standalone force. Read More.

IN THE STATES

States Push Back as Data Center Boom Sparks Midterm Tensions

Data center expansion is quickly becoming a state-level political flashpoint, with at least 11 states introducing legislation to restrict or halt development amid growing concerns over power usage, water strain, and local infrastructure. Maine is on track to become the first state to impose a temporary ban, while others are exploring limits tied to environmental impact, energy costs, and consumer protections, signaling a broader wave of state-led action in the absence of federal policy. 


The issue is cutting across party lines, forcing governors and state lawmakers to balance economic growth and AI investment against rising constituent backlash. With proposals ranging from outright moratoriums to tighter regulations, how states respond could shape not only local economies but also national political narratives around energy, affordability, and technological expansion heading into 2026. Read More.

EMERGING NARRATIVES

The Check-Writers: Self-Funders Flood 2026 Congressional Races

Wealthy candidates are betting their own fortunes on congressional seats across the country in 2026. In Maryland's 6th District, David Trone, co-founder of Total Wine & More and one of the biggest self-funders in congressional history, has already poured more than $10 million into a primary challenge against the incumbent he personally endorsed to succeed him (read more). In San Francisco, former AOC chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti has self-funded nearly $5 million chasing Nancy Pelosi's open seat while raising just $61,000 from actual donors so far this year (read more). Three Democrats in New Jersey’s competitive 7th District primary enter the final stretch with similar cash on hand, but only Rebecca Bennett built her war chest entirely from donor fundraising, while her opponents rely heavily on self-funding (read more).

The pattern reflects a broader trend that has reshaped congressional campaigns for years. Self-funding candidates cashed in millions to their own races in recent cycles, and 2026 is on pace to continue that momentum. But the track record is uneven at best. Just look at David Trone; he spent over $60 million in the 2024 Maryland Senate primary and lost by 11 points. Money buys airtime. It doesn't always buy votes.

ON THE HORIZON

Upcoming Elections:


April 21:
Virginia Redistricting Amendment


May 5:
Indiana Primary
Ohio Primary


May 12:
Nebraska Primary
West Virginia Primary
North Carolina Runoff


May 16:
Louisiana Primary


May 19:
Alabama Primary
Georgia Primary
Idaho Primary
Kentucky Primary
Oregon Primary
Pennsylvania Primary


July 15, 2026
SNAPSHOT
By Bob Salera July 9, 2026
The DSA Surge: What Socialist Primary Wins Mean for Business and the Policy Landscape In the span of two election cycles, the Democratic Socialists of America have gone from insurgent outsiders to a genuine force inside the Democratic Party. A new analysis of DSA's national endorsement record shows 25 primary wins across 15 states so far in the 2025-2026 cycle, a 62 percent success rate stretching from New York city councils to congressional primaries in Pennsylvania and Colorado. The trend is accelerating, and its implications run well beyond the halls of Congress. A Narrow Majority and a Familiar Problem The most immediate political concern is what happens on Capitol Hill if Democrats win the House with a thin margin. Hakeem Jeffries would face the same arithmetic Kevin McCarthy encountered with the House Freedom Caucus: a small group of ideologically committed members can hold a majority hostage. McCarthy was driven from the speakership in October 2023 by fewer than ten members. A larger DSA-aligned caucus, operating from the opposite end of the spectrum with fresh electoral mandates and no institutional loyalty to leadership, could prove equally disruptive. The Squad has already shown a willingness to break with Democratic leadership on appropriations, foreign policy, and procedural votes. More members with the same ideological profile and stronger grassroots backing would only amplify that dynamic. The Bigger Story Is Not Congress Congress gets the attention, but state legislatures and local governments set the conditions in which businesses actually operate. DSA candidates have won primaries in Georgia's state house, Minnesota's city councils, and city councils from New Jersey to Wisconsin to Arizona. These offices are pipelines. Today's Ithaca city councilmember is tomorrow's state legislator. The ideology rarely moderates as candidates advance. DSA's tracker shows an overall candidate win rate just above 50 percent since 2016, but the trend line matters: their 2025 cycle rate hit 62 percent, among the highest in their history. They are getting better at targeting winnable races, recruiting credible candidates, and turning out their base in low-turnout primaries where a motivated minority can determine outcomes. What It Means for Business in Blue States DSA's platform is not a vague progressive wish list. It calls for high progressive taxation, aggressive labor mandates, rent control, restructuring or defunding police, and opposition to most market-rate development. In jurisdictions where DSA-backed officials hold real power, those positions have translated into tangible policy. Minneapolis, where DSA holds several city council seats, has moved aggressively on landlord restrictions and business tax increases. San Francisco, where DSA-backed supervisor Dean Preston held power for years, saw some of the most restrictive commercial policies of any major American city before his 2024 defeat. Chicago's DSA aldermanic bloc has been a consistent source of opposition to development and public safety investment. These are not abstract ideological disputes. They represent direct compliance costs, operational risk, and a fundamentally less hospitable environment for investment. The National Drag, the State-Level Threat Nationally, a Democratic Party increasingly defined by its socialist wing faces real structural vulnerabilities. The 2024 results underscored how badly economic anxiety and perceptions of ideological overreach damage Democrats with working-class voters. An overtly socialist brand does not win back those voters. In competitive states and districts, it is a liability. But DSA does not need to win nationally to reshape policy. In blue states, a narrow legislative majority is enough to pass sweeping changes to tax policy, labor law, zoning, and regulatory structure. The voters most affected by those policies often have no political recourse. They cannot flip the state, and moving is not always an option. The Bottom Line DSA's electoral growth is not a narrative. It is a documented trend with a consistent track record across eight years and nearly 300 tracked candidates. For business and advocacy organizations, the lesson is that down-ballot primaries are where the policy environment is actually determined. A city council race in Milwaukee or a state house primary in Georgia does not generate national headlines, but it shapes the regulatory and tax climate that affects daily operations. Monitoring these races, engaging early, and understanding who holds office at every level of government matters more now than at any point in recent memory. The decisions being made in city council chambers today are the legislation being voted on in state capitals in five years.
By Ashlee Stephenson July 7, 2026
President Ashlee Rich Stephenson joined Steve Scully on SiriusXM POTUS to discuss the U.S. Senate landscape. Ashlee stated, "If I'm a Democratic operative, I'm hoping Haley Stevens pulls this out. Nominating a Democratic Socialist of America-backed candidate to run statewide in a true battleground would present real challenges for Democrats. If we start seeing Democratic Socialist of America candidates winning Senate nominations in states like Michigan, it signals a broader shift with implications that extend to the Electoral College, the presidency, and the future of free enterprise." And prior to the breaking news on Platner re-evaluating his campaign, they also covered Maine's Senate race, where Ashlee argued that Sen. Susan Collins remains in a strong position. Collins' long-standing reputation and the value Mainers place on character make the race far more challenging for Democrats than many expected, turning what was once viewed as a top pickup opportunity into a much more difficult path. Watch the full analysis of the 2026 U.S. Senate landscape here:
By Kelly McElhaney July 1, 2026
State of Play: Five Things We Are Tracking As Congress limps into the July 4th recess, it appears that the legislative agenda will remain in gridlock. The ongoing disagreements will ultimately define the remainder of the summer and fall calendar. SAVE America Act rebellion is freezing the House floor. A group of House conservatives have twice blocked procedural rules this week, demanding that leadership force action on the SAVE America Act. The faction has stalled many must-pass items and sent members home early for the second week in a row. Speaker Johnson needs near-unanimous GOP support to move anything with such a razor-thin majority. FY27 NDAA a victim of House Gridlock. The House Armed Services Committee has released a $1.15 trillion topline NDAA, with Chairman Rogers framing it around industrial base revitalization and getting to the administration's defense spending target. As of this week, the bill is caught in the SAVE America Act crossfire, with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's push to attach the voter ID measure via amendment threatening to sink it in the Senate, where it needs Democratic votes to clear a filibuster. FY27 appropriations are inching forward. The House has passed two FY27 spending bills (MilCon-VA and Agriculture-FDA) and was set to take up the State Foreign Operations bill this week before the SAVE Act revolt punted it again. With the Senate in recess for two weeks, and the end of the fiscal year fast approaching, the path to a full-year deal versus another continuing resolution remains in question. Surface transportation reauthorization is racing against a September 30 deadline. With the IIJA's five-year authorization set to expire on September 30, the House T&I Committee advanced the bipartisan $580 billion BUILD America 250 Act (H.R. 8870) out of committee with a bipartisan 62-2 vote in May championed by Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen. Floor time has not yet been announced, but committee leadership is hopeful it will be secured before the August recess. The Senate hasn't released its proposal yet, but early signals suggest strong continuity with the House version, with a streamlined return to the legislation’s original core functions. The urgency to move is driven by a very real funding problem: the Highway Trust Fund is projected to run dry by 2028, the House bill addresses this with a new EV and hybrid fees. Senate Appropriations markups keep getting delayed. Movement is expected once the Senate returns from its two-week recess. Senate Appropriations has postponed its full-committee markups of Agriculture-FDA, Commerce-Justice-Science, Legislative Branch, and MilCon-VA for the fourth time. Defense Subcommittee Chairman Mitch McConnell's hospitalization left Republicans short a vote. He is anticipated to return later this month.
July 1, 2026
SNAPSHOT
By Mischa Martin June 26, 2026
More Than a Phone Call: The Real Work of Effective Advocacy Government relations is not just about knowing who to call. It is about identifying the right person, knowing why to call them, and how to frame the conversation when you do. Recently, a client who is a healthcare provider reached out for support. They had supported a licensing change that moved them into a new category, a shift that made sense as a way to better align oversight with the services being delivered. What nobody anticipated was that the change triggered simultaneous obligations under two separate, similar state statutes. Two divisions within the same agency were now required to conduct independent maltreatment investigations of the same event on sequential timelines, leaving staff on administrative leave for months and operations significantly disrupted — with most allegations ultimately unfounded. The provider had attempted to resolve the issues but was frustrated. They needed a strategy. Step One: Understand the Law A side-by-side analysis of both statutes mapped jurisdiction, investigation requirements, and timelines. It identified the precise point of overlap and, just as importantly, room within existing law to coordinate that had not yet been explored. Without that foundation, there is no credible position, no realistic solution, and no productive conversation with anyone who has authority to act. Step Two: Know Your Audience The framing had to acknowledge what both statutes were designed to protect while making clear the current process was producing a significant burden without additional protective value. Understanding the agency's own position and constraints was essential to developing a message they could act on rather than defend against. Step Three: Engage the Agency First The first call was not to a legislator. It was to the agency. Going to them first signals good faith and allows them to be part of the solution. A legislative fix takes a session. An administrative accommodation can be processed within weeks. The agency reviewed the analysis, agreed that the duplication did not serve the intent of either statute, and agreed to streamline the process within existing authority. Step Four: Build Toward a Long-Term Solution The streamlining was a meaningful win and not the finish line. The statutory ambiguity remains, and both sides recognized that a legislative fix is likely necessary to fully resolve the issue. The short-term work built the trust to get there together. Effective advocacy is not a single conversation. Done well, it does not just solve the problem at hand. It builds the foundation to resolve greater future issues. And the agencies and legislators who are part of that process are far more likely to become partners in solving the next problem too.