AxInsights Survey: Americans Are Open to Innovation, But Want Guardrails

AxAdvocacy–Ipsos Survey Highlights Public Views on AI, Data Centers, Corporate Mergers, and Domestic Manufacturing

AxAdvocacy recently partnered with Ipsos to conduct a national survey of 1,025 Americans from February 20–22, 2026, examining public attitudes toward emerging technology, corporate consolidation, and U.S. economic and national security policy. The survey carries a ±3.2% margin of error.

The results point to a pragmatic electorate. Americans remain open to innovation and economic growth, but they want guardrails that protect communities, jobs, and national security. Across several issue areas, from artificial intelligence to corporate mergers, voters consistently evaluate policy through the lens of economic impact and national resilience.


Key takeaway: Americans support innovation, but economic impact and community effects shape their views.

Data Centers: Awareness Is Growing, but Energy Concerns Dominate

As artificial intelligence expands rapidly, public awareness of the data centers required to support it is increasing.

According to the survey, 61% of Americans say they are familiar with data centers, including 21% who report being very familiar and 40% who say they are somewhat familiar. Another 37% report they are not familiar with the issue.

While awareness is relatively high, voters also express clear concerns about the local impacts associated with large-scale data center development.

  • 58% worry about strain on local infrastructure
  • 58% worry about increased local energy prices
  • 38% cite noise or land-use concerns
  • 38% worry about environmental impacts
  • 35% express concern about foreign ownership of data centers


Only eight percent (8%) of respondents say they would have no concerns about data centers being built in their communities.

Artificial Intelligence: Opportunity Tempered by Skepticism

Public attitudes toward artificial intelligence reflect a mixture of optimism and caution.

Just 13% of Americans view AI primarily as an opportunity, while 34% see it mainly as a risk. The largest share (42%) believe that AI represents both opportunity and risk equally.

  • 39% say an AI regulatory 'sandbox' is a good idea
  • 22% say it is a bad idea
  • 37% are unsure


When voters are asked to choose between prioritizing innovation or limiting risk:

  • 69% say AI should be regulated early to limit risks
  • 12% say innovation should be prioritized even if risks remain
  • 17% remain unsure


When asked who should lead the regulation of artificial intelligence:

  • 50% say federal and state governments
  • 18% say the private sector
  • 30% are unsure


69% of Americans say AI should be regulated early to limit risks.

Corporate Mergers: Jobs and Prices Drive Public Opinion

Public attitudes toward corporate mergers are strongly influenced by perceived economic consequences.

When asked which factor matters most when evaluating corporate mergers:

  • 33% cite impact on jobs
  • 29% cite impact on prices
  • 8% cite global competitiveness
  • 6% cite national security
  • 5% cite stock prices and shareholder value


These results suggest voters evaluate corporate consolidation primarily through the lens of household economics rather than investor outcomes.


A majority of respondents (53%) believe mergers involving critical infrastructure should face stricter regulatory review than mergers in other industries.

Domestic Manufacturing and National Security

The survey also finds overwhelming support for strengthening domestic industrial capacity.


When asked how important it is for the United States to manufacture critical materials domestically:

  • 55% say it is very important
  • 33% say it is somewhat important


In total, almost nine in ten Americans (89%) believe domestic manufacturing of critical materials is important.

Implications for Public Affairs

Across the issues examined in the survey, one theme emerges consistently: Americans approach policy debates with a pragmatic focus on economic and national security outcomes.

Voters are broadly supportive of innovation and technological progress, but they also expect safeguards that protect communities, strengthen domestic production, and prevent negative impacts on jobs and prices.

For organizations engaged in public policy debates, the findings reinforce the importance of framing policy discussions around economic impact, national competitiveness, and community outcomes.

The Ipsos survey offers a snapshot of the priorities likely to shape policy conversations in Washington and across the country in the years ahead.

Ashlee Stephenson

President

AxAdvocacy Expands to Ohio with Addition of Former State Representative Jon Cross as Principal

By Bob Salera • September 1, 2026
AxAdvocacy Expands to Ohio with Addition of Former State Representative Jon Cross as Principal Firm’s Columbus practice marks its latest expansion into key state capitals

Public Affairs Has a Performance Problem

By Ashlee Stephenson • August 13, 2026
Public Affairs Has a Performance Problem There is a hard truth our industry doesn't like to admit. Public affairs has become far too comfortable confusing activity with accomplishment. Too many firms celebrate meetings instead of momentum. They count bill introductions instead of policy victories. They send clients long recaps filled with updates everyone could have read themselves and call it strategy. That isn't advocacy. That's administration. Clients aren't hiring us to tell them what happened in Washington yesterday. They're hiring us to change what happens tomorrow. Somewhere along the way, much of our industry accepted that checking the box was enough. Weekly reports became the deliverable. Legislative summaries became the strategy. Calendar invites became evidence of value. Meanwhile, the companies paying the bills are facing the fastest-moving policy environment in decades. Artificial Intelligence Trade Tariffs Tax Policy Energy Workforce Shortages Antitrust China ESG Supply Chains State Activism Election Volatility The stakes have never been higher. Yet many public affairs programs are operating exactly as they did fifteen years ago. That should concern every CEO. Effort Isn't a KPI One of the biggest myths in our profession is that effort equals value. It doesn't. Clients don't care how many meetings you scheduled. They care whether their issue moved. They don't care how many memos you wrote. They care whether the narrative changed. They don't care how busy your team looked. They care whether they are better positioned because of your work. Being busy has become a substitute for being effective. The two are not the same. The Next Generation of Public Affairs The firms that will define the next decade won't be the ones with the biggest lobbying teams. They'll be the ones that integrate policy, communications, research, digital strategy, coalition building, and executive positioning into one coordinated campaign. Public affairs isn't just government relations anymore. It’s: Business Strategy Market Strategy Reputation Management Competitive Advantage The firms still operating in silos will be left behind. Relationships Matter. Initiative Matters More. Relationships remain the currency of influence. But relationships alone are no longer enough. Clients expect: Ideas before they ask for them Opportunities before they appear Intelligence before it becomes news Their advisors to think like business leaders - not order takers The firms creating the most value today aren't waiting for assignments. They are creating opportunities. Raise the Standard This profession deserves better than status updates disguised as strategy. It deserves: Curiosity Creativity Relentless preparation A bias toward action An obsession with producing measurable outcomes Our clients don't need more emails. They don't need another legislative summary. They need partners willing to challenge conventional thinking, anticipate what's next, and fight relentlessly for results. That's the standard. It should be the expectation - not the exception.

AxAdvocacy Launches Full-Service California Government Relations Practice with Addition of Veteran Lobbyist Joe Devine

By Bob Salera • August 3, 2026
Firm significantly expands its presence in the nation's largest state economy, offering clients a fully integrated federal, state, local, and public affairs platform.

AxIndex, Edition 15

July 28, 2026
SNAPSHOT

AxIndex, Edition 14

July 15, 2026
SNAPSHOT

The DSA Surge: What Socialist Primary Wins Mean for Business and the Policy Landscape

By Bob Salera • July 9, 2026
The DSA Surge: What Socialist Primary Wins Mean for Business and the Policy Landscape  In the span of two election cycles, the Democratic Socialists of America have gone from insurgent outsiders to a genuine force inside the Democratic Party. A new analysis of DSA's national endorsement record shows 25 primary wins across 15 states so far in the 2025-2026 cycle, a 62 percent success rate stretching from New York city councils to congressional primaries in Pennsylvania and Colorado. The trend is accelerating, and its implications run well beyond the halls of Congress. A Narrow Majority and a Familiar Problem The most immediate political concern is what happens on Capitol Hill if Democrats win the House with a thin margin. Hakeem Jeffries would face the same arithmetic Kevin McCarthy encountered with the House Freedom Caucus: a small group of ideologically committed members can hold a majority hostage. McCarthy was driven from the speakership in October 2023 by fewer than ten members. A larger DSA-aligned caucus, operating from the opposite end of the spectrum with fresh electoral mandates and no institutional loyalty to leadership, could prove equally disruptive. The Squad has already shown a willingness to break with Democratic leadership on appropriations, foreign policy, and procedural votes. More members with the same ideological profile and stronger grassroots backing would only amplify that dynamic. The Bigger Story Is Not Congress Congress gets the attention, but state legislatures and local governments set the conditions in which businesses actually operate. DSA candidates have won primaries in Georgia's state house, Minnesota's city councils, and city councils from New Jersey to Wisconsin to Arizona. These offices are pipelines. Today's Ithaca city councilmember is tomorrow's state legislator. The ideology rarely moderates as candidates advance. DSA's tracker shows an overall candidate win rate just above 50 percent since 2016, but the trend line matters: their 2025 cycle rate hit 62 percent, among the highest in their history. They are getting better at targeting winnable races, recruiting credible candidates, and turning out their base in low-turnout primaries where a motivated minority can determine outcomes. What It Means for Business in Blue States DSA's platform is not a vague progressive wish list. It calls for high progressive taxation, aggressive labor mandates, rent control, restructuring or defunding police, and opposition to most market-rate development. In jurisdictions where DSA-backed officials hold real power, those positions have translated into tangible policy. Minneapolis, where DSA holds several city council seats, has moved aggressively on landlord restrictions and business tax increases. San Francisco, where DSA-backed supervisor Dean Preston held power for years, saw some of the most restrictive commercial policies of any major American city before his 2024 defeat. Chicago's DSA aldermanic bloc has been a consistent source of opposition to development and public safety investment. These are not abstract ideological disputes. They represent direct compliance costs, operational risk, and a fundamentally less hospitable environment for investment. The National Drag, the State-Level Threat Nationally, a Democratic Party increasingly defined by its socialist wing faces real structural vulnerabilities. The 2024 results underscored how badly economic anxiety and perceptions of ideological overreach damage Democrats with working-class voters. An overtly socialist brand does not win back those voters. In competitive states and districts, it is a liability. But DSA does not need to win nationally to reshape policy. In blue states, a narrow legislative majority is enough to pass sweeping changes to tax policy, labor law, zoning, and regulatory structure. The voters most affected by those policies often have no political recourse. They cannot flip the state, and moving is not always an option. The Bottom Line DSA's electoral growth is not a narrative. It is a documented trend with a consistent track record across eight years and nearly 300 tracked candidates. For business and advocacy organizations, the lesson is that down-ballot primaries are where the policy environment is actually determined. A city council race in Milwaukee or a state house primary in Georgia does not generate national headlines, but it shapes the regulatory and tax climate that affects daily operations. Monitoring these races, engaging early, and understanding who holds office at every level of government matters more now than at any point in recent memory. The decisions being made in city council chambers today are the legislation being voted on in state capitals in five years.