Chris Pack Discusses Ripple Effect of Zohran Mamdani’s NYC Mayoral Primary Win

Chris Pack Discusses Ripple Effect of Zohran Mamdani’s NYC Mayoral Primary Win

 

AxAdvocacy Principal for Communications Chris Pack discussed the ripple effects of democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in the New York City mayoral primary with The Hill’s Julia Manchester. Pack noted the win will fuel an ongoing shift to the left within the Democratic Party’s base.


Former NRCC communications director Chris Pack said the mayoral primary results are “a powder keg” that is “waiting to explode for Democrats.” 

 

“I’ve never seen such measured responses like we have seen from people like Jeffries and Schumer. It represents an ongoing passing of the torch from the old guard of the party to the younger generation that is far more extreme in their views,” Pack said. 

 

The full story can be viewed below or by clicking HERE. 

 

Republicans target vulnerable Democrats over Mamdani: ‘They own him’

The Hill 

By Julia Manchester

June 27, 2025

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5372192-republicans-target-mamdani-new-york/

 

Republicans are seeking to use Zohran Mamdani’s apparent win in New York City’s Democratic primary to put Democrats on defense in House and Senate races ahead of 2026. 

 

A number of House Democrats facing competitive reelection bids have already moved to distance themselves from Mamdani, while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D) stopped short of endorsing Mamdani following his win on Wednesday. 

 

Mamdani’s affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America, coupled with other far-left-leaning views is giving Republicans fodder to target Democrats in New York and beyond. 


“Every Democrat in America is going to have to answer for these insane positions,” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) told The Hill. “They own him. This is how radicalized their party has become.” 


The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) tied progressives in Minnesota and Michigan to Mamdani in a statement following his presumed win on Wednesday. 

 

“The grassroots Democrat energy behind socialist Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan and radical Peggy Flanagan in Minnesota is a serious threat to everything Americans elected President Trump and Senate Republicans to protect,” said NRSC communications director Joanna Rodriguez. 

In a separate statement, National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) said every “vulnerable House Democrat will own” Mamdani. 

 

Reps. Laura Gillen (D-N.Y.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), who are both facing competitive reelection bids, distanced themselves from Mamdani on Wednesday. Gillen referred to Mamdani as a “socialist” and “too extreme” in a statement, saying he is “the absolute wrong choice for New York.” 

 

Suozzi noted that the concerns he had about Mamdani prior to the primary “remain.”

The two top Democrats on Capitol Hill, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) offered neutral takes on the race, congratulating Mamdani but stopping short of endorsing him. 

 

“Every race is different and everyone’s politics are different,” said Antjuan Seawright, an adviser to Jeffries. “We must give everyone breathing room to do what’s necessary in order for us to accomplish our mission in the House.” 

 

Former NRCC communications director Chris Pack said the mayoral primary results are “a powder keg” that is “waiting to explode for Democrats.” 

 

“I’ve never seen such measured responses like we have seen from people like Jeffries and Schumer. It represents an ongoing passing of the torch from the old guard of the party to the younger generation that is far more extreme in their views,” Pack said. 

 

Republicans are also trying to drag Mamdani into some of the region’s marquee governors’ races. 

 

Potential New York Republican gubernatorial candidates are also looking to cash in on Mamandani’s win. Stefanik and Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) both sent out fundraising appeals, tying incumbent Gov. Kathy Hochul (R-N.Y.) to the likely Democratic nominee for New York City mayor. 

 

The Republican Governors Association also sought to tie New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial nominee Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) to Mamdani in a statement on Thursday. 

 

“It’s not that hard to disavow socialism, and Mikie Sherrill’s official comments saying she shares the goals of Socialist Zohran Mamdani is not only absurd, but it is disqualifying, period full stop,” the group said in a statement. 

 

Sherrill noted that she has disagreements with Mamdani in a statement, but agreed with him that affordability is a major issue for voters. 

 

“Voters want leaders who understand their daily struggles and are willing to throw out the old playbook to solve them, and while I have plenty of disagreements with Mr. Mamdani, I share his voters’ goal of making life more affordable,” Sherrill said. “I’m focused on my race and bringing costs down in New Jersey.”

 

Some Democrats who supported former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the primary argue that the GOP attacks are a natural consequence of Mamdani’s win.

 

“New York City primary voters have just handed Donald Trump a gift,” said Jon Reinish, a New York-based Democratic strategist. “Zohran Mamdani’s politics only translate and only are a thing in the most liberal districts in a primary.” 

 

Others note that the Mamdani’s upset win cannot be translated across the midterm map. 

“A Democratic primary for a mayoral race certainly doesn’t define the map or the math,” Seawright said. 

 

However, Republicans say that New York City’s sheer size and status as an economic giant allows Republicans to paint with a broad brush. 

 

“This is New York. It’s an emblem of America,” said Republican strategist Matt Beynon. “It is uniquely different.” 

 

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) said that efforts from their counterparts at the NRCC ultimately amounted to a distraction from Trump’s legislative agenda. 

“The NRCC is desperate to change the subject from the big, ugly bill, because they know their plans to strip health care and food assistance from everyday Americans to give tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy will cost them the House majority,” DCCC spokesman Viet Shelton said in a statement to The Hill. 

 

And it would not be the first time Republicans sought to tie Democrats, particularly in New York, to the city’s mayor. Last year, Republicans worked to tie New York Democrats to New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) in the wake of his indictment on federal corruption charges. 

 

A number of New York-area House Democrats won their reelection bids, but Trump improved his performance in New York City and New York State last year. 

 

“It would be malpractice, frankly, not to highlight what’s going on in New York and saying this is what they want, this is the America they envision, and do you really want this?” Beynon, the GOP strategist, said.



By Caleb Franz • September 10, 2026
The Post-Recess Congressional Outlook Congress returned from its five-week August recess and sent a bill to the President to fund the government through December 11, but the major fiscal and policy fights remain unresolved. That makes the CR a ceasefire, not a resolution — the fight over spending and policy is still ahead. The Clock The calendar is shrinking by the week. The House returned August 31, then canceled its remaining two full work weeks in September, leaving a single four-day session (September 14-17) before members leave for the campaign trail. The Senate has a bit more time, scheduled to stay in session through October 2. The September 30 fiscal-year deadline is no longer the immediate deadline because the CR extends funding through December 11. Neither chamber has the runway to finish the remaining major legislative agenda items before Election Day. The likely outcome is that decisions on government funding beyond December 11, the FY27 National Defense Authorization Act, and the fate of a third reconciliation package extend into the lame-duck session - decided by a Congress that may look different than the one sitting today. Appropriations & NDAA Appropriations and NDAA are traditional must-pass priorities. Reconciliation is optional. Appropriations remain the most immediate pressure point, and the December 11 deadline only buys time on the FY27 spending bills. All twelve have cleared the House Appropriations Committee, but only three have passed the full floor, and the Senate hasn't reported a single one out of committee. That disparity reflects the two chambers' unresolved fight over topline defense and non-defense spending levels. Absent a herculean effort by the leadership of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, passing any of the outstanding bills across both chambers by year's end is unlikely, and another stopgap will likely be necessary. After six decades of annual enactment, the odds are in favor of Congress ultimately producing an NDAA. The House passed its version in July by a narrow margin, authorizing roughly $250 billion more in defense spending than FY26 levels. The Senate's version is still pending, stalled since a failed July cloture vote, and even once it passes, a conference committee still has to reconcile the two chambers' different versions before anything reaches the President's desk. NDAA hasn't been signed into law before December in any of the last several cycles; last year's version wasn't signed until December 18, and this year is tracking the same way. With no official Senate passed product, the two chambers will begin informal conference discussions in earnest after the Congress officially breaks for the election season. Reconciliation 3.0 Reconciliation is the one item on this list Congress does not have to touch. Republicans already used the process once this year, passing a second reconciliation bill in June that provided roughly $70 billion in funding for ICE and CBP. A third package, built around Iran war funding, agricultural aid, and provisions tied to Republicans' election-law priorities, cleared the House in July, but the Senate has not advanced it. Majority Leader Thune has said he'd rather hold the framework in reserve as leverage for the funding fight than spend it on a standalone package before the election. Its prospects are likely to depend in significant part on how the funding negotiations develop as well as the election outcome. If one or both Chambers flip, look for Republicans to revisit reconciliation efforts as a last-ditch effort to provide funding to the Administration for key priorities prior to the new Congress. What the Election Changes The election will determine how much leverage each side has during the lame-duck period. With the election on November 3 and the CR expiring December 11, the lame-duck Congress would have roughly five weeks to resolve the next round of government funding. If Republicans retain both chambers, they can continue pursuing their legislative agenda, but the incentive to complete major priorities before the new Congress takes office would still depend on the size of their margins and the remaining legislative calendar. If Democrats win either chamber, the outgoing GOP majority faces greater pressure to resolve outstanding priorities before the new Congress takes office, when the balance of power could shift. That could create a final push to lock in NDAA authorization levels and take another run at reconciliation before new members take office in January. The Bottom Line The next sixty days matter more than the usual pre-election lull suggests. The major open questions: the FY27 spending bills, NDAA authorization levels, and whether Republicans pursue a third reconciliation bill, remain unresolved. Organizations with a stake in any of these three fights have a narrower window than usual to get specific asks attached before that happens, and that window closes well before Congress reconvenes in January.
By Bob Salera • September 1, 2026
AxAdvocacy Expands to Ohio with Addition of Former State Representative Jon Cross as Principal Firm’s Columbus practice marks its latest expansion into key state capitals
By Ashlee Stephenson • August 13, 2026
Public Affairs Has a Performance Problem There is a hard truth our industry doesn't like to admit. Public affairs has become far too comfortable confusing activity with accomplishment. Too many firms celebrate meetings instead of momentum. They count bill introductions instead of policy victories. They send clients long recaps filled with updates everyone could have read themselves and call it strategy. That isn't advocacy. That's administration. Clients aren't hiring us to tell them what happened in Washington yesterday. They're hiring us to change what happens tomorrow. Somewhere along the way, much of our industry accepted that checking the box was enough. Weekly reports became the deliverable. Legislative summaries became the strategy. Calendar invites became evidence of value. Meanwhile, the companies paying the bills are facing the fastest-moving policy environment in decades. Artificial Intelligence Trade Tariffs Tax Policy Energy Workforce Shortages Antitrust China ESG Supply Chains State Activism Election Volatility The stakes have never been higher. Yet many public affairs programs are operating exactly as they did fifteen years ago. That should concern every CEO. Effort Isn't a KPI One of the biggest myths in our profession is that effort equals value. It doesn't. Clients don't care how many meetings you scheduled. They care whether their issue moved. They don't care how many memos you wrote. They care whether the narrative changed. They don't care how busy your team looked. They care whether they are better positioned because of your work. Being busy has become a substitute for being effective. The two are not the same. The Next Generation of Public Affairs The firms that will define the next decade won't be the ones with the biggest lobbying teams. They'll be the ones that integrate policy, communications, research, digital strategy, coalition building, and executive positioning into one coordinated campaign. Public affairs isn't just government relations anymore. It’s: Business Strategy Market Strategy Reputation Management Competitive Advantage The firms still operating in silos will be left behind. Relationships Matter. Initiative Matters More. Relationships remain the currency of influence. But relationships alone are no longer enough. Clients expect: Ideas before they ask for them Opportunities before they appear Intelligence before it becomes news Their advisors to think like business leaders - not order takers The firms creating the most value today aren't waiting for assignments. They are creating opportunities. Raise the Standard This profession deserves better than status updates disguised as strategy. It deserves: Curiosity Creativity Relentless preparation A bias toward action An obsession with producing measurable outcomes Our clients don't need more emails. They don't need another legislative summary. They need partners willing to challenge conventional thinking, anticipate what's next, and fight relentlessly for results. That's the standard. It should be the expectation - not the exception.
By Bob Salera • August 3, 2026
Firm significantly expands its presence in the nation's largest state economy, offering clients a fully integrated federal, state, local, and public affairs platform.
July 28, 2026
SNAPSHOT
July 15, 2026
SNAPSHOT