AxIndex, Edition 10

 

SNAPSHOT

 

Our Top 3:


1) Redistricting Tilts Right as Democrats Pivot to 2028:
Two court rulings reshaped the map in recent weeks: the Virginia Supreme Court struck down a voter-approved Democratic plan, and the U.S. Supreme Court vacated a Mississippi ruling protecting Black voting strength. Republicans now project gains of up to 15 seats across the South and Midwest, against six potential Democratic gains in California and Utah. House Democrats are responding by targeting New York, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington for 2028 redraws. With control of the House likely to hinge on a handful of seats, even small map shifts could prove decisive.


2) Cassidy Becomes the Highest-Profile Casualty of Trump's Retribution Tour:

Sen. Bill Cassidy finished third in Louisiana's GOP Senate primary with 25 percent, behind Trump-backed Rep. Julia Letlow (45 percent) and former Trump official John Fleming (28 percent), who advanced to a June 27 runoff. Cassidy spent $21 million defending his seat but could not overcome Trump's targeting over his 2021 impeachment vote. Only Sens. Collins and Murkowski remain among Senate Republicans who voted to convict. Attention now shifts to Tuesday's Kentucky primary, where Rep. Thomas Massie faces a Trump-recruited challenger in the most expensive House primary ever at $32 million. The big question is whether Trump-aligned primary winners carry the same edge in competitive generals.


3) Polling Shows Trump Endorsements Cut Both Ways:

New POLITICO Poll modeling finds Trump's endorsement remains the most powerful force in GOP primaries but a likely liability in battleground generals. His backing made 2024 Trump voters 22 percent more likely to support a candidate, but pushed 2024 Harris voters 55 percent less likely to support a candidate, a net negative overall. Pro-crypto and pro-AI-deregulation endorsements proved similarly toxic to voters of both parties. The findings echo 2018 research showing Trump's nods can drag down GOP nominees in swing seats. As Trump stays active in primaries from Louisiana to Texas, the dynamic could shape how nominees position themselves for November.


 

National Sentiment Tracking

 

Trump's China Trip Yields Few Wins as Approval Hits Second-Term Low

President Trump returned from a two-day visit to Beijing without securing concrete commitments on the Strait of Hormuz, where a 79-day-old conflict with Iran continues to drive up gas prices and squeeze the U.S. economy. A new NYT-Siena poll released Monday found 64 percent of Americans, including 73 percent of independents, view the Iran war as a mistake, while Trump's overall approval rating fell to 37 percent, a second-term low. With 76 percent rating the economy fair or poor and Speaker Mike Johnson openly expressing concern about Trump's refusal to leverage Xi for relief at the pump, the trip did little to ease the political headwinds confronting the GOP heading into November. Trump's reluctance to engage in traditional horse-trading and his vague characterization of the visit's "deliverables" underscore the difficulty of converting foreign policy into domestic political relief. Read More.

Democrats Open Double-Digit Generic Ballot Lead in NYT-Siena Poll

A new New York Times-Siena survey shows Democrats leading the generic congressional ballot 50 percent to 39 percent, with 11 percent unsure, an 11-point margin and one of the cleanest Democratic advantages of the cycle. The poll surveyed 1,507 registered voters from May 11–15, with 90 percent saying they plan to vote in the midterms.


The advantage comes despite Republicans holding a cash-on-hand edge of $78.2 million to $69.9 million as of February, signaling that the political environment, not financial firepower, is the dominant force. With six months to go, generic ballot leads of this size have historically been a strong indicator of how a president's party will perform in the midterms.
Read More.

GOP Loses Its Traditional Economic Advantage as Affordability Anger Mounts

A new CNN/SSRS poll finds 77 percent of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, say Trump's policies have increased the cost of living, while his approval on the economy has fallen to 30 percent, a career low. Democrats now lead on trust to handle the cost of living by 9 points and hold double-digit advantages on income inequality, healthcare costs, and helping the middle class, reversing the GOP's 15-point edge on economic issues in 2022.

With 55 percent of Americans naming the economy as the country's most important issue and Democrats leading 45-42 on the generic ballot, the data signals a structural realignment of which party voters trust on pocketbook concerns. The shift is particularly significant given that Republicans built much of their post-Biden coalition on inflation frustration.
Read More.

HOUSE HIGHLIGHTS

Polling At A Glance

House
RCP Average Generic Ballot: 48.8 Dem - 41.6 GOP (D +7.2)
On this day in:
2022: 45.4 GOP - 43.2 Dem (R+2.2)
2018: 45.0 Dem - 40.3 GOP (D+4.7)


Recent Polls
Quantus (KY-04 GOP Primary): Gallrein 53, Massie (i) 45
Big Data Poll (KY-04 GOP Primary): Massie (i) 50, Gallrein 50
SoCal Strategies (KY-04 GOP Primary): Gallrein 49, Massie (i) 42



Cook Ratings
Recent changes:
MO-05 (Cleaver): Solid Dem -> Solid GOP


Retirements

For context, during the first Trump term, there were 52 retirements from the House. 

Massie Faces Trump's Wrath in Most Expensive House Primary in History

Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie faces voters Tuesday in a primary that has drawn more than $32 million in ad spending, the most ever in a House primary, according to AdImpact. Trump personally recruited challenger Ed Gallrein, a former Navy SEAL, after Massie voted against the Big Beautiful Bill, sponsored a war powers resolution against the Iran strikes, and joined the bipartisan push to release the Epstein files. Trump-aligned and pro-Israel groups have dominated the ad spending against Massie, while the libertarian congressman has retained a small bench of allies, including Sen. Rand Paul and Reps. Boebert, Davidson, and Spartz. The race serves as the next major test of Trump's intraparty retribution campaign after Saturday's Cassidy ouster, with Massie betting on younger voters and a generational divide to survive. Read More.

Philadelphia Primary Becomes Flashpoint as Congressional Black Caucus Faces Existential Threat

The Democratic primary to replace retiring Rep. Dwight Evans in Pennsylvania's 3rd District, the bluest in the country, has become a proxy fight over the future of Black political representation, with up to one-third of the 63-member Congressional Black Caucus potentially losing seats to red-state gerrymanders.


Three Black candidates are competing: state Rep. Chris Rabb, backed by progressives including AOC, Summer Lee, and Maxwell Frost; state Sen. Sharif Street, backed by Sen. Cory Booker, Philadelphia Mayor Cherelle Parker, and former Gov. Ed Rendell; and pediatric surgeon Ala Stanford, endorsed by Evans, Reps. Madeleine Dean and Chrissy Houlahan, and an outside STEM-focused super PAC.


The race highlights generational and ideological divides within the CBC, just as Reps. Jim Clyburn and Bennie Thompson face potential losses to GOP redistricting. The outcome will shape both the caucus's direction and the Democratic Party's broader debate over establishment versus progressive leadership. Read More.

Redistricting

Democrats Pivot to 2028 Maps After Virginia and Alabama Setbacks

Following the Virginia Supreme Court's rejection of the Democratic-drawn map and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision allowing Alabama to redraw minority districts, House Democrats are shifting their redistricting focus to 2028, with Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries pushing blue states, including New York, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington, to act before the next cycle.


Maryland Gov. Wes Moore is publicly pressuring state Senate President Bill Ferguson, his lone Democratic holdout, to authorize a mid-cycle map that could add a seat. House Majority PAC, which spent $38 million on the failed Virginia effort, is now seeding ballot initiatives in Colorado and preparing for legal fights in GOP-redrawn states. The strategic shift acknowledges that Republicans may dominate the 2026 map war but signals Democrats intend to fight a longer battle for the 2028 cycle. Read More.

Supreme Court Vacates Mississippi Redistricting Ruling, Expanding VRA Rollback

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday vacated a lower court ruling that had found Mississippi lawmakers unlawfully diluted Black voting strength and ordered the case reconsidered in light of the recent Callais decision, which weakened Voting Rights Act protections. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the sole dissenter, noting the appeal had only raised a narrower question about private parties' standing under the VRA.


The original lower-court ruling had triggered special elections last year that flipped one Mississippi House seat and two Senate seats to Democrats, gains now potentially at risk. The high court's action signals a continuing pattern of vacating VRA-based rulings and gives Mississippi Republicans an opening to reinstate maps that had been struck down. Read More.

South Carolina Eyes 7-0 GOP Map, but Republican Doubts Surface

South Carolina House Republicans began debating a new congressional map Monday that could yield a clean sweep of the state's seven U.S. House seats by targeting Rep. Jim Clyburn's majority-Black district. Some Republicans, including state Rep. Nathan Ballentine, have voiced reservations, citing constituent opposition and concern that a 7-0 map could spread GOP voters too thin in currently safe districts.


House Republicans voted nearly unanimously to limit each member to one amendment and three minutes of debate after more than 600 amendments were filed. Nationally, Republicans believe they could gain as many as 15 seats from new maps across Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Florida, Tennessee, and Alabama, against six potential Democratic gains in California and Utah. Read More.

SENATE HIGHLIGHTS

Polling At A Glance

Recent Polls


Detroit Chamber/Glengariff (MI General): Rogers (R) 45, El-Sayed (D) 40
Detroit Chamber/Glengariff (MI General): Rogers (R) 43, McMorrow (D) 41
Detroit Chamber/Glengariff (MI General): Rogers (R) 44, Stevens (D) 42
MIRS/Mitchell Research (MI General): Rogers (R) 42, El-Sayed (D) 41
MIRS/Mitchell Research (MI General): Rogers (R) 42, Stevens (D) 39
MIRS/Mitchell Research (MI General): Rogers (R) 43, McMorrow (D) 41
MIRS/Mitchell Research (MI Dem Primary): El-Sayed 28, Stevens 18, McMorrow 17
Carolina Journal/Harper (NC General): Cooper (D) 50, Whatley (R) 39
Remington Research (AL GOP Primary): Moore 23, Hudson 20, Marshall 16, Deas 2, Walker 1
Insider Advantage (SC GOP Primary): Graham (i) 56, Lynch 13, Cowen 3, Mitchell 2, Dismukes 2, Herrmann 1
TSU/YouGov (TX General): Paxton (R) 45, Talarico (D) 45
TSU/YouGov (TX General): Cornyn (R-i) 45, Talarico (D) 44
Carolina Forward/Change Research (NC General): Cooper (D) 49, Whatley (R) 42


Retirements

So far, 11 Senators have announced their retirement from the chamber at the end of the current Congress.


Trump Endorses Paxton in Texas Senate Runoff, Reshaping the Race

President Trump on Tuesday endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over Sen. John Cornyn in the May 26 GOP Senate runoff, capping more than a year of jockeying for the president's backing. The endorsement landed a day after early voting began, with the latest University of Houston poll already showing Paxton ahead 48-45 among likely runoff voters. Trump praised Paxton as a "true MAGA Warrior" who "knows how to WIN," while noting Cornyn was "very late in backing" his 2024 campaign. Paxton, who has consistently led with the GOP base and aligned closely with Trump's agenda, including the SAVE America Act, now heads into the final week with the most powerful endorsement in Republican politics.


The move is a significant boost for Paxton, who has cast Cornyn as a creature of the Washington establishment despite the senator's late-cycle efforts to align with Trump, including the reversal of his longstanding defense of the filibuster. Democratic nominee James Talarico, who raised more than $27 million in the first quarter, has polled competitively against both Republicans, but Paxton allies argue his stronger connection to the GOP base will be decisive in a state Trump carried by 14 points. Coming three days after Sen. Bill Cassidy's Louisiana primary loss and on the same day as Rep. Thomas Massie's Kentucky primary, the endorsement underscores Trump's continued sway over Republican primaries heading into November. Read More.



Cassidy Loses Louisiana Primary as Trump's Retribution Campaign Advances

Sen. Bill Cassidy finished third in Louisiana's GOP Senate primary on Saturday, drawing roughly 25 percent of the vote behind Trump-backed Rep. Julia Letlow (45 percent) and former Trump administration official John Fleming (28 percent), who will advance to a June 27 runoff. Cassidy spent more than $21 million defending his seat but could not overcome Trump's targeting over his vote on the 2021 impeachment, his uneasy alliance with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Louisiana's recent move to closed primaries. The loss leaves Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski as the only remaining 2021 impeachment voters in the Senate and further consolidates the chamber behind the president.

Broader Context: Axios
reported earlier this week that Sen. Thom Tillis is privately fuming over the ouster and has warned that pushing this week's reconciliation package could similarly damage Sen. John Cornyn in next week's Texas runoff. Read More.

EMERGING NARRATIVES

AI Industry Targets Manhattan Primary in First Major Test of Political Muscle

State Assemblyman Alex Bores, running in a crowded 12-candidate Democratic primary for Rep. Jerry Nadler's open Manhattan seat, has become the first major target of a new AI super PAC called Leading the Future, which has spent more than $2 million on attack ads against him. Bores authored a New York AI safety bill signed into law by Gov. Hochul last year, drawing the ire of OpenAI and Andreessen Horowitz, whose principals anchor Leading the Future's $125 million war chest.

AI companies have collectively pledged about $265 million for super PACs ahead of the midterms, modeled on crypto's $200 million 2024 spending blitz, while Anthropic has seeded $20 million into a counter-group, Public First Action. The race will establish whether AI industry money can take out a regulation-friendly candidate, mirroring the playbook that helped crypto secure favorable federal policy under the Trump administration.
Read More.

Polling Suggests Trump's Endorsement Could Hurt Battleground Republicans

A new POLITICO Poll experiment finds that while Trump's endorsement increases support among 2024 Trump voters by 22 percent, it makes 2024 Harris voters 55 percent less likely to support a candidate, yielding a net negative effect across the full electorate. The findings echo prior research showing endorsements often generate stronger backlash than support, particularly when the endorser is divisive.


The polling also found that endorsements from pro-cryptocurrency and pro-deregulation AI groups are toxic to voters of both parties, while Medicare for All and stronger AI regulation produced net positive reactions. The data suggests Trump's primary kingmaking power could become a liability in the general election, and helps explain why outside super PACs, particularly in the crypto and AI industries, typically spend on messaging that obscures their underlying agenda rather than openly endorsing candidates. Read More.

Data Centers Become Political Flashpoint as Opposition Hits 70 Percent

A new Gallup survey finds seven in ten Americans oppose building data centers in their communities, with 56 percent of Democrats expressing strong opposition. Half of opponents cite the drain on water and energy resources, while another 22 percent cite quality-of-life concerns, and one in five raise cost worries.


The numbers underscore why data centers have become a bipartisan target as states from Maine to Maryland weigh moratoriums and restrictions, and why tech companies are scrambling to soften the projects' image. The growing backlash positions data centers as a midterm-cycle wedge issue with crossover appeal in suburban and rural districts alike. Read More.

ON THE HORIZON

Upcoming Elections:


May 19:
Alabama Primary
Georgia Primary
Idaho Primary
Kentucky Primary
Oregon Primary
Pennsylvania Primary


May 26:
Texas Runoff


June 2:
California Primary
CA-01 Special Primary
Iowa Primary
Montana Primary
New Jersey Primary
New Mexico Primary
South Dakota Primary


June 9:
Maine Primary
Nevada Primary
North Dakota Primary
South Carolina Primary


June 16:
CA-14 Special Primary
Oklahoma Primary
Alabama Primary Runoff
Georgia Primary Runoff


By Bob Salera September 1, 2026
AxAdvocacy Expands to Ohio with Addition of Former State Representative Jon Cross as Principal Firm’s Columbus practice marks its latest expansion into key state capitals
By Ashlee Stephenson August 13, 2026
Public Affairs Has a Performance Problem There is a hard truth our industry doesn't like to admit. Public affairs has become far too comfortable confusing activity with accomplishment. Too many firms celebrate meetings instead of momentum. They count bill introductions instead of policy victories. They send clients long recaps filled with updates everyone could have read themselves and call it strategy. That isn't advocacy. That's administration. Clients aren't hiring us to tell them what happened in Washington yesterday. They're hiring us to change what happens tomorrow. Somewhere along the way, much of our industry accepted that checking the box was enough. Weekly reports became the deliverable. Legislative summaries became the strategy. Calendar invites became evidence of value. Meanwhile, the companies paying the bills are facing the fastest-moving policy environment in decades. Artificial Intelligence Trade Tariffs Tax Policy Energy Workforce Shortages Antitrust China ESG Supply Chains State Activism Election Volatility The stakes have never been higher. Yet many public affairs programs are operating exactly as they did fifteen years ago. That should concern every CEO. Effort Isn't a KPI One of the biggest myths in our profession is that effort equals value. It doesn't. Clients don't care how many meetings you scheduled. They care whether their issue moved. They don't care how many memos you wrote. They care whether the narrative changed. They don't care how busy your team looked. They care whether they are better positioned because of your work. Being busy has become a substitute for being effective. The two are not the same. The Next Generation of Public Affairs The firms that will define the next decade won't be the ones with the biggest lobbying teams. They'll be the ones that integrate policy, communications, research, digital strategy, coalition building, and executive positioning into one coordinated campaign. Public affairs isn't just government relations anymore. It’s: Business Strategy Market Strategy Reputation Management Competitive Advantage The firms still operating in silos will be left behind. Relationships Matter. Initiative Matters More. Relationships remain the currency of influence. But relationships alone are no longer enough. Clients expect: Ideas before they ask for them Opportunities before they appear Intelligence before it becomes news Their advisors to think like business leaders - not order takers The firms creating the most value today aren't waiting for assignments. They are creating opportunities. Raise the Standard This profession deserves better than status updates disguised as strategy. It deserves: Curiosity Creativity Relentless preparation A bias toward action An obsession with producing measurable outcomes Our clients don't need more emails. They don't need another legislative summary. They need partners willing to challenge conventional thinking, anticipate what's next, and fight relentlessly for results. That's the standard. It should be the expectation - not the exception.
By Bob Salera August 3, 2026
Firm significantly expands its presence in the nation's largest state economy, offering clients a fully integrated federal, state, local, and public affairs platform.
July 28, 2026
SNAPSHOT
July 15, 2026
SNAPSHOT
By Bob Salera July 9, 2026
The DSA Surge: What Socialist Primary Wins Mean for Business and the Policy Landscape  In the span of two election cycles, the Democratic Socialists of America have gone from insurgent outsiders to a genuine force inside the Democratic Party. A new analysis of DSA's national endorsement record shows 25 primary wins across 15 states so far in the 2025-2026 cycle, a 62 percent success rate stretching from New York city councils to congressional primaries in Pennsylvania and Colorado. The trend is accelerating, and its implications run well beyond the halls of Congress. A Narrow Majority and a Familiar Problem The most immediate political concern is what happens on Capitol Hill if Democrats win the House with a thin margin. Hakeem Jeffries would face the same arithmetic Kevin McCarthy encountered with the House Freedom Caucus: a small group of ideologically committed members can hold a majority hostage. McCarthy was driven from the speakership in October 2023 by fewer than ten members. A larger DSA-aligned caucus, operating from the opposite end of the spectrum with fresh electoral mandates and no institutional loyalty to leadership, could prove equally disruptive. The Squad has already shown a willingness to break with Democratic leadership on appropriations, foreign policy, and procedural votes. More members with the same ideological profile and stronger grassroots backing would only amplify that dynamic. The Bigger Story Is Not Congress Congress gets the attention, but state legislatures and local governments set the conditions in which businesses actually operate. DSA candidates have won primaries in Georgia's state house, Minnesota's city councils, and city councils from New Jersey to Wisconsin to Arizona. These offices are pipelines. Today's Ithaca city councilmember is tomorrow's state legislator. The ideology rarely moderates as candidates advance. DSA's tracker shows an overall candidate win rate just above 50 percent since 2016, but the trend line matters: their 2025 cycle rate hit 62 percent, among the highest in their history. They are getting better at targeting winnable races, recruiting credible candidates, and turning out their base in low-turnout primaries where a motivated minority can determine outcomes. What It Means for Business in Blue States DSA's platform is not a vague progressive wish list. It calls for high progressive taxation, aggressive labor mandates, rent control, restructuring or defunding police, and opposition to most market-rate development. In jurisdictions where DSA-backed officials hold real power, those positions have translated into tangible policy. Minneapolis, where DSA holds several city council seats, has moved aggressively on landlord restrictions and business tax increases. San Francisco, where DSA-backed supervisor Dean Preston held power for years, saw some of the most restrictive commercial policies of any major American city before his 2024 defeat. Chicago's DSA aldermanic bloc has been a consistent source of opposition to development and public safety investment. These are not abstract ideological disputes. They represent direct compliance costs, operational risk, and a fundamentally less hospitable environment for investment. The National Drag, the State-Level Threat Nationally, a Democratic Party increasingly defined by its socialist wing faces real structural vulnerabilities. The 2024 results underscored how badly economic anxiety and perceptions of ideological overreach damage Democrats with working-class voters. An overtly socialist brand does not win back those voters. In competitive states and districts, it is a liability. But DSA does not need to win nationally to reshape policy. In blue states, a narrow legislative majority is enough to pass sweeping changes to tax policy, labor law, zoning, and regulatory structure. The voters most affected by those policies often have no political recourse. They cannot flip the state, and moving is not always an option. The Bottom Line DSA's electoral growth is not a narrative. It is a documented trend with a consistent track record across eight years and nearly 300 tracked candidates. For business and advocacy organizations, the lesson is that down-ballot primaries are where the policy environment is actually determined. A city council race in Milwaukee or a state house primary in Georgia does not generate national headlines, but it shapes the regulatory and tax climate that affects daily operations. Monitoring these races, engaging early, and understanding who holds office at every level of government matters more now than at any point in recent memory. The decisions being made in city council chambers today are the legislation being voted on in state capitals in five years.